Intervention Preferences, Barriers, and Motivators of Nonstudent Emerging Adult Drinkers

Emerging adults with lower educational attainment are at elevated risk for a range of negative outcomes. Relative to college populations, far less attention has focused on reducing drinking-related risks among noncollege-attending young adults. Research that elucidates nonstudents' preferences for interventions along with differences based on drinking-related risk level is critical to the development of tailored efficacious intervention approaches. We aimed to describe nonstudent emerging adults' intervention utilization and presenting concerns, as well as intervention preferences and perceived motivators and barriers to intervention engagement. We also examined differences based on drinking-related risk status (i.e., high vs. low-risk drinkers). Our sample consisted of nonstudent drinkers (<i>N</i> = 184) who completed a cross-sectional, online survey. Results revealed surprisingly low intervention utilization histories. Participants largely preferred online or web-based services over other modalities, which may be related to high endorsement of access-related barriers. Certain barriers and motivators were more endorsed than others among the overall sample. High-risk drinkers had higher endorsement of barriers related to access (e.g., time, costs) and personal or emotional concerns (e.g., lack of support, shame and embarrassment) relative to low-risk drinkers. Our findings provide key insights into possible approaches for improving alcohol intervention efforts among this underserved, high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Drug Education
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00472379251389674
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intervention Preferences, Barriers, and Motivators of Nonstudent Emerging Adult Drinkers

Isabel Martinez, Emily Junkin, Cathy Lau‐Barraco, Emma K. Rawls
Journal of Drug Education
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

Intervention Preferences, Barriers, and Motivators of Nonstudent Emerging Adult Drinkers

Isabel Martinez, Emily Junkin, Cathy Lau‐Barraco, Emma K. Rawls
article en

Abstract

Emerging adults with lower educational attainment are at elevated risk for a range of negative outcomes. Relative to college populations, far less attention has focused on reducing drinking-related risks among noncollege-attending young adults. Research that elucidates nonstudents' preferences for interventions along with differences based on drinking-related risk level is critical to the development of tailored efficacious intervention approaches. We aimed to describe nonstudent emerging adults' intervention utilization and presenting concerns, as well as intervention preferences and perceived motivators and barriers to intervention engagement. We also examined differences based on drinking-related risk status (i.e., high vs. low-risk drinkers). Our sample consisted of nonstudent drinkers (<i>N</i> = 184) who completed a cross-sectional, online survey. Results revealed surprisingly low intervention utilization histories. Participants largely preferred online or web-based services over other modalities, which may be related to high endorsement of access-related barriers. Certain barriers and motivators were more endorsed than others among the overall sample. High-risk drinkers had higher endorsement of barriers related to access (e.g., time, costs) and personal or emotional concerns (e.g., lack of support, shame and embarrassment) relative to low-risk drinkers. Our findings provide key insights into possible approaches for improving alcohol intervention efforts among this underserved, high-risk population.

Journal of Drug EducationVol. 55(1)
Dominion University College (GH), Virginia Clinical Research (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.