Impact of dietary concentrates on young Nellore and crossbred (Angus × Nellore) bulls finished in a feedlot: Intake, performance, and meat quality

Context The crossbreeding of Bos taurus taurus × Bos taurus indicus cattle has become a valuable alternative for improving performance and carcass quality. In addition, the production system adopted and the diets provided cannot only improve animal performance but also generate a product with characteristics that are more attractive to consumers. Aims The objectives of this study were to evaluate the dry-matter intake, performance, and meat quality of Nellore (purebred, NEL) and crossbred (Angus vs Nellore, AN) bulls fed with two levels of concentrate (65 and 85%). Methods Forty-eight young bulls of similar age (18 ± 2 months) were separated in the following four groups on the basis of breed and diet: Group 1: NEL 65% (n = 12; initial bodyweight (IBW): 415.66 kg ± 21.82 kg); Group 2: NEL 85% (n = 11; IBW 416.23 kg ± 21.96 kg); Group 3: AN 65% (n = 12; IBW 458.13 kg ± 24.59 kg); and Group 4: AN 85% (n = 13; IBW 463.54 kg ± 26.06 kg). The young bulls stayed on trial for 105 days (21 days for adaptation and 84 finishing) and were all slaughtered at the same time. Key results The crossbred animals showed greater average bodyweight, average daily gain, hot carcass weight, and average daily gain in carcass. There was no difference between breed or diet (P > 0.05) in dry-matter intake (DMI). The diet or breed did not affect the tenderness but did affect the color. Conclusions Even though there was no difference between breeds in the DMI, crossbred animals presented better performance than did Nellore animals. Both breeds showed a lighter-color meat, although the meat of crossbred animals was lighter, in both diets, than was that of the NEL fed 85% diet. Moreover, the use of crossbreed Angus × Nellore is a valuable strategy to improve performance and meat quality in a tropical area. Implications The superior growth performance and hot carcass weight of crossbred animals support crossbreeding as a strategy to improve beef production efficiency. Nellore animals’ meat was as tender as that of crossbred animals, which might be associated with a greater presence of proteolytic enzymes in the AN carcass owing to a genetic presence of Bos indicus in the evaluated F1 AN animals, resulting in no breed differences. However, diet and breed influenced meat color, a trait associated with favorable consumer perception, where AN animals presented a lighter meat. These findings suggest that performance can be achieved alongside desirable quality attributes. However, future research may search for a crossbreeding threshold level for meat tenderness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Production Science
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/an24388
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of dietary concentrates on young Nellore and crossbred (Angus × Nellore) bulls finished in a feedlot: Intake, performance, and meat quality

Ângela Maria Quintão Lana, Luciano Soares de Lima, Jason E. Rowntree, R. C. Alvarenga et al.
Animal Production Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Impact of dietary concentrates on young Nellore and crossbred (Angus × Nellore) bulls finished in a feedlot: Intake, performance, and meat quality

Ângela Maria Quintão Lana, Luciano Soares de Lima, Jason E. Rowntree, R. C. Alvarenga, Lucas Freires Abreu, E. C. Martins, L. S. Lopes, Fernando Antônio de Souza, Afonso de Liguori Oliveira
article en

Abstract

Context The crossbreeding of Bos taurus taurus × Bos taurus indicus cattle has become a valuable alternative for improving performance and carcass quality. In addition, the production system adopted and the diets provided cannot only improve animal performance but also generate a product with characteristics that are more attractive to consumers. Aims The objectives of this study were to evaluate the dry-matter intake, performance, and meat quality of Nellore (purebred, NEL) and crossbred (Angus vs Nellore, AN) bulls fed with two levels of concentrate (65 and 85%). Methods Forty-eight young bulls of similar age (18 ± 2 months) were separated in the following four groups on the basis of breed and diet: Group 1: NEL 65% (n = 12; initial bodyweight (IBW): 415.66 kg ± 21.82 kg); Group 2: NEL 85% (n = 11; IBW 416.23 kg ± 21.96 kg); Group 3: AN 65% (n = 12; IBW 458.13 kg ± 24.59 kg); and Group 4: AN 85% (n = 13; IBW 463.54 kg ± 26.06 kg). The young bulls stayed on trial for 105 days (21 days for adaptation and 84 finishing) and were all slaughtered at the same time. Key results The crossbred animals showed greater average bodyweight, average daily gain, hot carcass weight, and average daily gain in carcass. There was no difference between breed or diet (P > 0.05) in dry-matter intake (DMI). The diet or breed did not affect the tenderness but did affect the color. Conclusions Even though there was no difference between breeds in the DMI, crossbred animals presented better performance than did Nellore animals. Both breeds showed a lighter-color meat, although the meat of crossbred animals was lighter, in both diets, than was that of the NEL fed 85% diet. Moreover, the use of crossbreed Angus × Nellore is a valuable strategy to improve performance and meat quality in a tropical area. Implications The superior growth performance and hot carcass weight of crossbred animals support crossbreeding as a strategy to improve beef production efficiency. Nellore animals’ meat was as tender as that of crossbred animals, which might be associated with a greater presence of proteolytic enzymes in the AN carcass owing to a genetic presence of Bos indicus in the evaluated F1 AN animals, resulting in no breed differences. However, diet and breed influenced meat color, a trait associated with favorable consumer perception, where AN animals presented a lighter meat. These findings suggest that performance can be achieved alongside desirable quality attributes. However, future research may search for a crossbreeding threshold level for meat tenderness.

Animal Production ScienceVol. 65(16)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.