Co-Designing for Graduate Student Mental Health: An Example of Participatory Research Methods in PER

In this work we present an example of participatory research methodologies: a co-design session.The session was an early stage of the development of a broader study of graduate student mental health, and it provided critical insights that helped shape the study design.This paper first motivates studying graduate student mental health and then describes our co-design process in detail.We discuss the particular activities performed and the motivations for each activity, foregrounding our design choices and how these choices attended to participant psychological safety.We finally describe participants' evaluation of the session as well as themes from the session that shaped the subsequent study design.This work highlights the value of meaningfully including members of a study population in the design and interpretation of physics education research studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2025.pr.banner
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-Designing for Graduate Student Mental Health: An Example of Participatory Research Methods in PER

Patrick Banner, Chandra Turpen, K. H. McManama O'Brien
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

Co-Designing for Graduate Student Mental Health: An Example of Participatory Research Methods in PER

Patrick Banner, Chandra Turpen, K. H. McManama O'Brien
article en

Abstract

In this work we present an example of participatory research methodologies: a co-design session.The session was an early stage of the development of a broader study of graduate student mental health, and it provided critical insights that helped shape the study design.This paper first motivates studying graduate student mental health and then describes our co-design process in detail.We discuss the particular activities performed and the motivations for each activity, foregrounding our design choices and how these choices attended to participant psychological safety.We finally describe participants' evaluation of the session as well as themes from the session that shaped the subsequent study design.This work highlights the value of meaningfully including members of a study population in the design and interpretation of physics education research studies.

University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.