Determining how context matters in an algebra-based physics class

The Dual-Process Theory of Reasoning (DPToR) is one of the theoretical frameworks used to examine students' reasoning in physics.So far, this framework has mainly been employed to analyze student reasoning in introductory calculus-based physics courses.In this study, we apply the framework and its corresponding methodology to explore student reasoning in algebra-based courses primarily taken by students majoring in life sciences.Additionally, we redesigned a set of traditional physics tasks to incorporate more familiar and relevant contexts for life science majors.Both the original and modified versions require the application of the same physics knowledge and skills but differ in context.The aim was to investigate how, if at all, these contextual modifications affect reasoning.The results largely replicate those documented in calculus-based physics courses, showing no observable effects of contextual changes on reasoning patterns.This finding highlights the robustness of the reasoning mechanisms described by DPToR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2025.pr.garcia
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining how context matters in an algebra-based physics class

Mila Kryjevskaia, Tyler Garcia
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Determining how context matters in an algebra-based physics class

Mila Kryjevskaia, Tyler Garcia
article en

Abstract

The Dual-Process Theory of Reasoning (DPToR) is one of the theoretical frameworks used to examine students' reasoning in physics.So far, this framework has mainly been employed to analyze student reasoning in introductory calculus-based physics courses.In this study, we apply the framework and its corresponding methodology to explore student reasoning in algebra-based courses primarily taken by students majoring in life sciences.Additionally, we redesigned a set of traditional physics tasks to incorporate more familiar and relevant contexts for life science majors.Both the original and modified versions require the application of the same physics knowledge and skills but differ in context.The aim was to investigate how, if at all, these contextual modifications affect reasoning.The results largely replicate those documented in calculus-based physics courses, showing no observable effects of contextual changes on reasoning patterns.This finding highlights the robustness of the reasoning mechanisms described by DPToR.

North Dakota State University (US)
National Science Foundation, North Dakota State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.