Help or Hype? Students' Engagement and Perception of Using AI to Solve Physics Problems

With the rise of large language models such as ChatGPT, interest has grown in understanding how these tools influence learning in STEM education, including physics.This study explores how students use ChatGPT during a physics problem-solving task embedded in a formal assessment.We analyzed patterns of AI usage and their relationship to student performance.Findings indicate that students who engaged with ChatGPT generally performed better than those who did not.Particularly, students who provided more complete and contextual prompts experienced greater benefits.Further, students who demonstrated overall positive gains collectively asked more conceptual questions than those who exhibited overall negative gains.However, the presence of incorrect AI-generated responses also underscores the importance of critically evaluating AI output.These results suggest that while AI can be a valuable aid in problem solving, its effectiveness depends significantly on how students use it, reinforcing the need to incorporate structured AI-literacy into STEM education.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2025.pr.mirza
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Help or Hype? Students' Engagement and Perception of Using AI to Solve Physics Problems

N. Sanjay Rebello, Qurat-ul-Ann Mirza
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Help or Hype? Students' Engagement and Perception of Using AI to Solve Physics Problems

N. Sanjay Rebello, Qurat-ul-Ann Mirza
article en

Abstract

With the rise of large language models such as ChatGPT, interest has grown in understanding how these tools influence learning in STEM education, including physics.This study explores how students use ChatGPT during a physics problem-solving task embedded in a formal assessment.We analyzed patterns of AI usage and their relationship to student performance.Findings indicate that students who engaged with ChatGPT generally performed better than those who did not.Particularly, students who provided more complete and contextual prompts experienced greater benefits.Further, students who demonstrated overall positive gains collectively asked more conceptual questions than those who exhibited overall negative gains.However, the presence of incorrect AI-generated responses also underscores the importance of critically evaluating AI output.These results suggest that while AI can be a valuable aid in problem solving, its effectiveness depends significantly on how students use it, reinforcing the need to incorporate structured AI-literacy into STEM education.

Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.