A global review of contaminants in True Geese

True Geese (genera Anser and Branta) are an important food source and a valuable indicator species across their wide geographic ranges. We conducted a review of contaminants in True Geese that compiled research from 56 journal articles, five reports, and three theses published between 2000 and 2024. These studies suggested that geese are at relatively low risk of deleterious health consequences from current levels of exposure to most legacy pesticides and metal contaminants. The exception was lead from lead shot and industrial pollution, which was considered a contaminant of concern for several species, including Canada geese ( Branta canadensis), snow geese ( Anser caerulescens), and greylag geese ( Anser anser) in 11 countries. Most studies we reviewed focused on geese in the southern parts of their ranges. Arctic-breeding ranges were underrepresented, despite substantial harvest and consumption of geese in Arctic communities. Furthermore, while metals and legacy contaminants such as dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were well-quantified, few studies monitored contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), such as microplastics, plastic additives, or perfluorochemicals (PFCs). We found no studies on the cumulative effects of contaminants on goose health. To better understand the sources and fate of contaminants in True Geese, we recommend four directions for future research. (1) Quantify CECs in geese near suspected hotspots (e.g., wastewater treatment plants and airports). (2) Sample eggs for multi-year monitoring of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), breast feathers for nonlethal assessment of metals, and muscle and liver for evaluating human consumption risk. (3) Conduct multi-year monitoring of geese across their full annual cycle to characterize annual fluctuations in contaminant loads associated with migration, moulting, and egg-laying, and link these contaminants to geographic sources. (4) Establish participatory biomonitoring networks in Arctic communities to fill geographical gaps and inform human health discussions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Reviews
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2025-0180
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A global review of contaminants in True Geese

Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Christina M. Davy, Alexa Arnyek et al.
1 citations
Environmental Reviews
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
1.20
article

A global review of contaminants in True Geese

Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Christina M. Davy, Alexa Arnyek, Emma Wong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

True Geese (genera Anser and Branta) are an important food source and a valuable indicator species across their wide geographic ranges. We conducted a review of contaminants in True Geese that compiled research from 56 journal articles, five reports, and three theses published between 2000 and 2024. These studies suggested that geese are at relatively low risk of deleterious health consequences from current levels of exposure to most legacy pesticides and metal contaminants. The exception was lead from lead shot and industrial pollution, which was considered a contaminant of concern for several species, including Canada geese ( Branta canadensis), snow geese ( Anser caerulescens), and greylag geese ( Anser anser) in 11 countries. Most studies we reviewed focused on geese in the southern parts of their ranges. Arctic-breeding ranges were underrepresented, despite substantial harvest and consumption of geese in Arctic communities. Furthermore, while metals and legacy contaminants such as dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were well-quantified, few studies monitored contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), such as microplastics, plastic additives, or perfluorochemicals (PFCs). We found no studies on the cumulative effects of contaminants on goose health. To better understand the sources and fate of contaminants in True Geese, we recommend four directions for future research. (1) Quantify CECs in geese near suspected hotspots (e.g., wastewater treatment plants and airports). (2) Sample eggs for multi-year monitoring of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), breast feathers for nonlethal assessment of metals, and muscle and liver for evaluating human consumption risk. (3) Conduct multi-year monitoring of geese across their full annual cycle to characterize annual fluctuations in contaminant loads associated with migration, moulting, and egg-laying, and link these contaminants to geographic sources. (4) Establish participatory biomonitoring networks in Arctic communities to fill geographical gaps and inform human health discussions.

Environmental ReviewsVol. 33
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA), National Wildlife Research Center, Carleton University (CA), Acadia University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.