In Situ Calibration of Passive Samplers for Monitoring Host-Associated Fecal Markers in an Urban River

The performance of two membrane-based passive samplers (Torpedo and MSTFlow) in quantifying sewage (Carjivirus, plant pepper mild mottle virus [PMMoV], tomato brown rugose fruit virus [ToBRFV]) and avian (Helicobacter spp. GFD marker) fecal pollution markers in an urban riverine environment over a 72-h deployment was evaluated using a first-order kinetic model to characterize their microbial adsorption characteristics. Results were compared with those from parallel composite and time-weighted autosampling. Passive sampler accumulation exhibited an initial lag phase (0 to 8 h for viruses) and reached equilibrium within 16 h of initial deployment, except for GFD. Sampling rates were highest for PMMoV (6.29 and 5.11 mL/h) for MSTFlow and Torpedo samplers respectively, followed by Carjivirus (4.63 and 3.63 mL/h), ToBRFV (2.17 and 1.22 mL/h) and GFD (0.68 mL/h in Torpedo sampler). At equilibrium, both sampler configurations accumulated 23 ->220 times the amount of target gene copies in each mL of grab water samples, depending on sampler and virus. These findings highlight passive sampling as a promising, sensitive, cost-effective, and low-maintenance alternative for continuous microbial water quality monitoring in aquatic environments. Overall, this study advances the understanding of passive sampling kinetics and supports their broader adoption for tracking fecal pollution in environmental waters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00841
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fecal contamination and water quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Situ Calibration of Passive Samplers for Monitoring Host-Associated Fecal Markers in an Urban River

Stuart L. Simpson, Yawen Liu, Warish Ahmed, Darryl W. Hawker et al.
1 citations
ACS ES&T Water
Fecal contamination and water quality
0.82
article

In Situ Calibration of Passive Samplers for Monitoring Host-Associated Fecal Markers in an Urban River

Stuart L. Simpson, Yawen Liu, Warish Ahmed, Darryl W. Hawker, Rory Verhagen, Wendy Smith, Metasebia Gebrewold
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The performance of two membrane-based passive samplers (Torpedo and MSTFlow) in quantifying sewage (Carjivirus, plant pepper mild mottle virus [PMMoV], tomato brown rugose fruit virus [ToBRFV]) and avian (Helicobacter spp. GFD marker) fecal pollution markers in an urban riverine environment over a 72-h deployment was evaluated using a first-order kinetic model to characterize their microbial adsorption characteristics. Results were compared with those from parallel composite and time-weighted autosampling. Passive sampler accumulation exhibited an initial lag phase (0 to 8 h for viruses) and reached equilibrium within 16 h of initial deployment, except for GFD. Sampling rates were highest for PMMoV (6.29 and 5.11 mL/h) for MSTFlow and Torpedo samplers respectively, followed by Carjivirus (4.63 and 3.63 mL/h), ToBRFV (2.17 and 1.22 mL/h) and GFD (0.68 mL/h in Torpedo sampler). At equilibrium, both sampler configurations accumulated 23 ->220 times the amount of target gene copies in each mL of grab water samples, depending on sampler and virus. These findings highlight passive sampling as a promising, sensitive, cost-effective, and low-maintenance alternative for continuous microbial water quality monitoring in aquatic environments. Overall, this study advances the understanding of passive sampling kinetics and supports their broader adoption for tracking fecal pollution in environmental waters.

ACS ES&T WaterVol. 5(11)
Griffith University (AU), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Fecal contamination and water quality
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.