Entrepreneurial imagination: A pluralistic scoping review of a sprawling literature

Entrepreneurial imagination (EI) lies at the core of entrepreneurship research. Both early and contemporary scholars have emphasized its central role in visualizing and actualizing entrepreneurial opportunities, shaping decision-making, and enabling venture creation. Perhaps because of its salience and significance, EI has been approached from a wide range of definitional, philosophical, theoretical, and methodological perspectives, fostering a conceptually rich yet sprawling and fragmented body of work. Drawing on a scoping literature review of articles published in leading management and entrepreneurship journals, we synthesize the diverse constructs, processes, and conceptualizations associated with EI. We adopt a pluralistic approach, identifying eight distinct theoretical perspectives that have shaped scholars' understanding of EI over time. Rather than seeking to unify these perspectives into a single framework, we provide a multidimensional account of EI that captures its complexity and explore possibilities for cross-pollination as an agenda for future research. By putting complementary and sometimes contrasting perspectives into conversation, especially where they address similar concerns or compensate for each other's limitations, we aim to inspire novel combinations and spark new questions that can meaningfully advance scholarship on EI. • Establish entrepreneurial imagination (EI) as foundational yet conceptually fragmented in entrepreneurship research. • Conduct a scoping review of the literature to explore EI's diverse constructs, processes, and conceptualizations. • Embrace pluralism in order to recognize the ontological, epistemological, and methodological diversity in EI research. • Identify, develop and review eight distinct theoretical perspectives on EI (e.g., cognitive, linguistic, moral, aesthetic). • Explore opportunities for cross-pollination between perspectives to offer a new, thought-provoking agenda for EI research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Venturing
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106555
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entrepreneurial imagination: A pluralistic scoping review of a sprawling literature

Alexander S. Kier, Todd H. Chiles, Joep Cornelissen, Neil Thompson
3 citations
Journal of Business Venturing
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
8.28
article

Entrepreneurial imagination: A pluralistic scoping review of a sprawling literature

Alexander S. Kier, Todd H. Chiles, Joep Cornelissen, Neil Thompson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Entrepreneurial imagination (EI) lies at the core of entrepreneurship research. Both early and contemporary scholars have emphasized its central role in visualizing and actualizing entrepreneurial opportunities, shaping decision-making, and enabling venture creation. Perhaps because of its salience and significance, EI has been approached from a wide range of definitional, philosophical, theoretical, and methodological perspectives, fostering a conceptually rich yet sprawling and fragmented body of work. Drawing on a scoping literature review of articles published in leading management and entrepreneurship journals, we synthesize the diverse constructs, processes, and conceptualizations associated with EI. We adopt a pluralistic approach, identifying eight distinct theoretical perspectives that have shaped scholars' understanding of EI over time. Rather than seeking to unify these perspectives into a single framework, we provide a multidimensional account of EI that captures its complexity and explore possibilities for cross-pollination as an agenda for future research. By putting complementary and sometimes contrasting perspectives into conversation, especially where they address similar concerns or compensate for each other's limitations, we aim to inspire novel combinations and spark new questions that can meaningfully advance scholarship on EI. • Establish entrepreneurial imagination (EI) as foundational yet conceptually fragmented in entrepreneurship research. • Conduct a scoping review of the literature to explore EI's diverse constructs, processes, and conceptualizations. • Embrace pluralism in order to recognize the ontological, epistemological, and methodological diversity in EI research. • Identify, develop and review eight distinct theoretical perspectives on EI (e.g., cognitive, linguistic, moral, aesthetic). • Explore opportunities for cross-pollination between perspectives to offer a new, thought-provoking agenda for EI research.

Journal of Business VenturingVol. 41(1)
Washington State University (US), University of Missouri (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
8.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.