Unpacking the Roles of Psychological Distress and Social Well-Being in Minority Stress: Everyday Discrimination and Life Satisfaction among Sexual- and Gender-Minority Adults

While many sexual- and gender-minority adults experience significant rates of everyday discrimination, less is known about how it shapes life satisfaction and the psychosocial mechanisms involved. Using three waves of nationwide data on 612 sexual- and gender-minority adults in the United States from the <i>Generations</i> study, we analyzed the relationships between everyday discrimination, psychological distress, social well-being, and life satisfaction. Structural equation modeling was conducted in R to test separate and chain mediation models. Everyday discrimination (T1) is significantly related to life satisfaction (T3) (β = ‒0.226, <i>p</i> = 0.019, 95% CI: [-0.414, -0.039]). In two separate mediation models, psychological distress (T2) mediates the relationship between everyday discrimination (T1) and life satisfaction (T3) (β = ‒0.084, <i>p</i> = 0.004, 95% CI: [-0.14, -0.027]). Social well-being (T2) also mediates this relationship (β = ‒0.034, <i>p</i> = 0.034, 95% CI: [-0.065, -0.003]). In the chain mediation model, social well-being is a preceding indicator of psychological distress and life satisfaction (β = ‒0.012, <i>p</i> = 0.043, 95% CI: [-0.023, -0.0004]). These findings suggest that social well-being is a proximal indicator that both reflects and transmits the effects of minority stress to worse mental health and well-being. Future research is recommended to position social well-being more centrally to examine its protective role in the impacts of minority stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Homosexuality
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2573452
Primary Topic
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking the Roles of Psychological Distress and Social Well-Being in Minority Stress: Everyday Discrimination and Life Satisfaction among Sexual- and Gender-Minority Adults

Sarah Jen, Zhiqi Yi, Nancy J. Kepple
Journal of Homosexuality
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
article

Unpacking the Roles of Psychological Distress and Social Well-Being in Minority Stress: Everyday Discrimination and Life Satisfaction among Sexual- and Gender-Minority Adults

Sarah Jen, Zhiqi Yi, Nancy J. Kepple
article en

Abstract

While many sexual- and gender-minority adults experience significant rates of everyday discrimination, less is known about how it shapes life satisfaction and the psychosocial mechanisms involved. Using three waves of nationwide data on 612 sexual- and gender-minority adults in the United States from the <i>Generations</i> study, we analyzed the relationships between everyday discrimination, psychological distress, social well-being, and life satisfaction. Structural equation modeling was conducted in R to test separate and chain mediation models. Everyday discrimination (T1) is significantly related to life satisfaction (T3) (β = ‒0.226, <i>p</i> = 0.019, 95% CI: [-0.414, -0.039]). In two separate mediation models, psychological distress (T2) mediates the relationship between everyday discrimination (T1) and life satisfaction (T3) (β = ‒0.084, <i>p</i> = 0.004, 95% CI: [-0.14, -0.027]). Social well-being (T2) also mediates this relationship (β = ‒0.034, <i>p</i> = 0.034, 95% CI: [-0.065, -0.003]). In the chain mediation model, social well-being is a preceding indicator of psychological distress and life satisfaction (β = ‒0.012, <i>p</i> = 0.043, 95% CI: [-0.023, -0.0004]). These findings suggest that social well-being is a proximal indicator that both reflects and transmits the effects of minority stress to worse mental health and well-being. Future research is recommended to position social well-being more centrally to examine its protective role in the impacts of minority stress.

Journal of Homosexuality
University of Kansas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.