Inverse probability weighting estimation under ultrahigh-dimensional error-prone covariates and misclassified treatments

Estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) is one of the fundamental problems in causal inference, as it quantifies the causal impact of a treatment on an outcome of interest. A widely used approach for ATE estimation is the inverse probability weighting method based on propensity scores. However, in practice, datasets often exhibit ultrahigh-dimensional covariates and measurement errors, which can lead to biased or unreliable ATE estimators if not properly addressed. In this paper, we focus on a challenging setting where both covariates and treatments may be measured with error, and the potential outcomes may exhibit nonlinear dependence on the covariates. To tackle these challenges and obtain a more accurate estimator of the ATE, we propose a novel method named FATE, which integrates feature screening, adaptive lasso, treatment adjustment, and error correction for covariates. The proposed feature screening procedure is based on measurement error adjusted data and is designed to accommodate a wide variety of outcome distributions. Furthermore, under appropriate corrections for both treatment misclassification and covariates measurement error, we construct a consistent estimator of the propensity score that accounts for possible collinearity. This leads to a reliable ATE estimator. Theoretical guarantees, including consistency and asymptotic properties, are established. Extensive numerical studies demonstrate that the proposed FATE method performs well and consistently outperforms several competing approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics and Computing
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-025-10755-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inverse probability weighting estimation under ultrahigh-dimensional error-prone covariates and misclassified treatments

Li‐Pang Chen
1 citations
Statistics and Computing
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
article

Inverse probability weighting estimation under ultrahigh-dimensional error-prone covariates and misclassified treatments

Li‐Pang Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) is one of the fundamental problems in causal inference, as it quantifies the causal impact of a treatment on an outcome of interest. A widely used approach for ATE estimation is the inverse probability weighting method based on propensity scores. However, in practice, datasets often exhibit ultrahigh-dimensional covariates and measurement errors, which can lead to biased or unreliable ATE estimators if not properly addressed. In this paper, we focus on a challenging setting where both covariates and treatments may be measured with error, and the potential outcomes may exhibit nonlinear dependence on the covariates. To tackle these challenges and obtain a more accurate estimator of the ATE, we propose a novel method named FATE, which integrates feature screening, adaptive lasso, treatment adjustment, and error correction for covariates. The proposed feature screening procedure is based on measurement error adjusted data and is designed to accommodate a wide variety of outcome distributions. Furthermore, under appropriate corrections for both treatment misclassification and covariates measurement error, we construct a consistent estimator of the propensity score that accounts for possible collinearity. This leads to a reliable ATE estimator. Theoretical guarantees, including consistency and asymptotic properties, are established. Extensive numerical studies demonstrate that the proposed FATE method performs well and consistently outperforms several competing approaches.

Statistics and ComputingVol. 36(1)
National Chengchi University (TW)
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.