Correcting for the Inflated Adult Population Denominator in an English Nationwide Health Care Cohort: Database Analysis Study

There are notable differences in the adult population size as per GDPPR when compared to census estimates. While the overall population size in the GDPPR data was seen to be inflated when compared to ONS census estimates, this was differential with respect to sociodemographic variables. A weighting-based approach can be applied to correct for the inflated denominator. Not correcting for it in large health care datasets, including the English NHS data, could introduce selection bias in epidemiological studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/64788
Primary Topic
Global Health Care Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correcting for the Inflated Adult Population Denominator in an English Nationwide Health Care Cohort: Database Analysis Study

Simon de Lusignan, Richard Hobbs, Chris Robertson, Wilhelmine Meeraus et al.
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Global Health Care Issues
article

Correcting for the Inflated Adult Population Denominator in an English Nationwide Health Care Cohort: Database Analysis Study

Simon de Lusignan, Richard Hobbs, Chris Robertson, Wilhelmine Meeraus, Gavin Jamie, Ruby S. M. Tsang, Kathryn Taylor, Xuejuan Fan, Robert Williams, Mark Joy, Sneha Anand, Debasish Kar, Sudhir Venkatesan, Sylvia Taylor
article en

Abstract

There are notable differences in the adult population size as per GDPPR when compared to census estimates. While the overall population size in the GDPPR data was seen to be inflated when compared to ONS census estimates, this was differential with respect to sociodemographic variables. A weighting-based approach can be applied to correct for the inflated denominator. Not correcting for it in large health care datasets, including the English NHS data, could introduce selection bias in epidemiological studies.

JMIR Public Health and SurveillanceVol. 11
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Strathclyde (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of Oxford (GB), AstraZeneca (South Korea) (KR), University of Plymouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Global Health Care Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Correcting for the Inflated Adult Population Denominator in an English Nationwide Health Care Cohort: Database Analysis Study — Simon de Lusignan, Richard Hobbs, et al. · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS