Incremental start and clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: International results from PDOPPS

BackgroundThe impact of incremental peritoneal dialysis (PD) on outcomes is poorly understood, and there is a paucity of evidence informing best practices regarding the dialysis dose at the commencement of PD. This international prospective cohort study aimed to compare PD prescription practices at dialysis commencement and their subsequent association with clinical outcomes.MethodsAdult patients who started PD for less than three months at the time of enrolment in the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS) between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017 were included. Patients were defined as initiating incremental PD if prescribed a total of <4 exchanges/day for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) or, with dry days or having PD less than seven days per week for automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). All other prescriptions were considered standard PD. The primary outcome was the transfer to haemodialysis (HD). Secondary outcomes included peritonitis rate, time to first peritonitis and mortality. Logistic regression analysed PD uptake and the Cox proportional hazards regression model analysed HD transfer, peritonitis and patient survival.ResultsOverall, 1365 PD patients from 128 facilities across seven countries were included. Fewer individuals started on incremental PD than standard PD (37% vs 63%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Higher incremental PD uptake was associated with receiving treatment in Japan (odds ratio [OR] 2.35, 95% CI 1.05-5.26, <i>p</i> = 0.04; ref: Canada), age >75 years (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.24, <i>p</i> = 0.04), icodextrin use (OR 8.54, 95% CI 6.26-11.64, <i>p</i> < 0.001), lower serum creatinine concentration at PD start (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.01, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and higher number of PD patients at a facility (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Crude HD transfer rates for the incremental and standard PD groups were 0.14 (95% CI, 0.12-0.16) and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.13-0.17) per patient-year of follow-up, respectively (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.75-1.15; <i>p</i> = 0.49). There was no significant difference in the hazard of HD transfer between the incremental and standard PD groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.68-1.12, <i>p</i> = 0.29). There were also no differences between the two groups concerning peritonitis and mortality.ConclusionsIncremental PD start was prescribed in approximately one-third of patients and, in low certainty evidence, was associated with comparable risks of HD transfer, peritonitis and death.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608251385614
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incremental start and clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: International results from PDOPPS

Jeffrey M. Perl, Louis Huang, Graham Woodrow, Rathika Krishnasamy et al.
1 citations
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
1.43
article

Incremental start and clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: International results from PDOPPS

Jeffrey M. Perl, Louis Huang, Graham Woodrow, Rathika Krishnasamy, Isaac Teitelbaum, Talerngsak Kanjanabuch, Ana Elizabeth Figueiredo, Yeoungjee Cho, Beth Piraino, David Wayne Johnson, Yasuhiko Ito, Melissa S Cheetham, Ashik Hayat, Keith McCullough, Cheuk‐Chun Szeto, Neil C Boudville, Junhui Zhao, Douglas S. Fuller, Ken Tsuchiya, Ronald L. Pisoni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BackgroundThe impact of incremental peritoneal dialysis (PD) on outcomes is poorly understood, and there is a paucity of evidence informing best practices regarding the dialysis dose at the commencement of PD. This international prospective cohort study aimed to compare PD prescription practices at dialysis commencement and their subsequent association with clinical outcomes.MethodsAdult patients who started PD for less than three months at the time of enrolment in the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS) between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017 were included. Patients were defined as initiating incremental PD if prescribed a total of <4 exchanges/day for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) or, with dry days or having PD less than seven days per week for automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). All other prescriptions were considered standard PD. The primary outcome was the transfer to haemodialysis (HD). Secondary outcomes included peritonitis rate, time to first peritonitis and mortality. Logistic regression analysed PD uptake and the Cox proportional hazards regression model analysed HD transfer, peritonitis and patient survival.ResultsOverall, 1365 PD patients from 128 facilities across seven countries were included. Fewer individuals started on incremental PD than standard PD (37% vs 63%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Higher incremental PD uptake was associated with receiving treatment in Japan (odds ratio [OR] 2.35, 95% CI 1.05-5.26, <i>p</i> = 0.04; ref: Canada), age >75 years (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.24, <i>p</i> = 0.04), icodextrin use (OR 8.54, 95% CI 6.26-11.64, <i>p</i> < 0.001), lower serum creatinine concentration at PD start (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.01, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and higher number of PD patients at a facility (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Crude HD transfer rates for the incremental and standard PD groups were 0.14 (95% CI, 0.12-0.16) and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.13-0.17) per patient-year of follow-up, respectively (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.75-1.15; <i>p</i> = 0.49). There was no significant difference in the hazard of HD transfer between the incremental and standard PD groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.68-1.12, <i>p</i> = 0.29). There were also no differences between the two groups concerning peritonitis and mortality.ConclusionsIncremental PD start was prescribed in approximately one-third of patients and, in low certainty evidence, was associated with comparable risks of HD transfer, peritonitis and death.

Peritoneal Dialysis InternationalVol. 46(2)
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), Translational Research Institute (AU), Chulalongkorn University (TH), The University of Queensland (AU), Aichi Medical University (JP), University of Pittsburgh (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), The University of Western Australia (AU), Tokyo Woman's Christian University (JP), St James's University Hospital (GB), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (AU), Eastern Health (AU), Sunshine Coast University Hospital (AU), Kidney Health Australia (AU), Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (US), Woman's Hospital (US), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.