Effects of urban green space types and historical Land Use/ Land Cover on soil health: Implications for sustainable management

Urban green space management is shifting from intensive maintenance toward sustainable practices in response to climate change and biodiversity loss. While reduced management intensity can enhance ecosystem services such as soil carbon storage, its impacts on overall soil health have been studied less extensively. We evaluated soil health using a composite index of key physical and chemical soil properties across six urban green space types (woody stands, single trees, hedges, wildflower meadows, shrubs, and short-cut lawns) in Giessen, Germany. High-resolution digital orthophotos were used to map Land Use/Land Cover. Soil samples were collected from 120 sites at three depths (0–1, 1–10, and 10–30 cm), totaling 360 samples. Significant differences were observed among green space types in soil health indicators, including soil organic carbon, nitrogen stocks, SOM/clay, C/N, Soil Stability Index, and macronutrient levels. Less intensively managed areas, such as woody stands and wildflower meadows, showed higher soil health status than intensively managed lawns (43.1, 32.5, and 21.7, respectively). Converting 100 m² of lawn to wildflower meadows could increase carbon storage, the key driver of the composite index, by approximately 160 kg. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) (CFI = 0.94) showed that both current and historical green space types like woody stands (β = 0.51), hedges (β= 0.22), wildflower meadows (β= 0.05), and past woody stands (β= 0.31) influence soil health. These findings support the development of urban soil health maps and underscore the value of sustainable green space management in enhancing urban soil health and long-term carbon storage. • Composite index assessed soil health across six urban green space types. • Woody vegetation showed superior soil structure and high carbon storage. • Short-cut lawns were linked to compaction and low soil organic matter. • Improved management could enhance carbon sequestration in short-cut lawns. • Soil health maps identified priority areas for sustainable green space planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban forestry & urban greening
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129143
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of urban green space types and historical Land Use/ Land Cover on soil health: Implications for sustainable management

André Große‐Stoltenberg, Mojdeh Safaei, Till Kleinebecker
3 citations
Urban forestry & urban greening
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
article

Effects of urban green space types and historical Land Use/ Land Cover on soil health: Implications for sustainable management

André Große‐Stoltenberg, Mojdeh Safaei, Till Kleinebecker
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Urban green space management is shifting from intensive maintenance toward sustainable practices in response to climate change and biodiversity loss. While reduced management intensity can enhance ecosystem services such as soil carbon storage, its impacts on overall soil health have been studied less extensively. We evaluated soil health using a composite index of key physical and chemical soil properties across six urban green space types (woody stands, single trees, hedges, wildflower meadows, shrubs, and short-cut lawns) in Giessen, Germany. High-resolution digital orthophotos were used to map Land Use/Land Cover. Soil samples were collected from 120 sites at three depths (0–1, 1–10, and 10–30 cm), totaling 360 samples. Significant differences were observed among green space types in soil health indicators, including soil organic carbon, nitrogen stocks, SOM/clay, C/N, Soil Stability Index, and macronutrient levels. Less intensively managed areas, such as woody stands and wildflower meadows, showed higher soil health status than intensively managed lawns (43.1, 32.5, and 21.7, respectively). Converting 100 m² of lawn to wildflower meadows could increase carbon storage, the key driver of the composite index, by approximately 160 kg. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) (CFI = 0.94) showed that both current and historical green space types like woody stands (β = 0.51), hedges (β= 0.22), wildflower meadows (β= 0.05), and past woody stands (β= 0.31) influence soil health. These findings support the development of urban soil health maps and underscore the value of sustainable green space management in enhancing urban soil health and long-term carbon storage. • Composite index assessed soil health across six urban green space types. • Woody vegetation showed superior soil structure and high carbon storage. • Short-cut lawns were linked to compaction and low soil organic matter. • Improved management could enhance carbon sequestration in short-cut lawns. • Soil health maps identified priority areas for sustainable green space planning.

Urban forestry & urban greeningVol. 114
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.