The Clinical and Economic Consequences of Delayed Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Delays in access to aortic valve replacement, the recommended treatment for aortic stenosis (AS), is common; however, the impact of this delay is not clearly known. This study aims to examine the clinical and economic consequences of delayed transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with clinically significant AS. We analyzed 4069 patients with clinically significant AS who underwent TAVR between July 2019 and June 2023 using the Optum Market Clarity database. Patients were categorized as timely TAVR (≤90 days from diagnosis) or delayed TAVR (>90 days or urgent/emergent procedure). Clinical outcomes included all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, stroke, and composite endpoints over 3 years. Economic outcomes included total health care costs and hospitalization utilization. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and generalized linear models were used for analysis. Of 4069 patients, 2051 (50.4%) received timely TAVR and 2018 (49.6%) received delayed TAVR. Delayed patients had higher frailty scores (10.9 vs. 8.5; p < 0.01) but similar comorbidity burden. At 3 years, delayed TAVR was associated with significantly higher composite outcomes (50.1 vs. 36.8%; hazard ratio (HR): 1.52; p < 0.01), mortality (19.5 vs. 13.7%; HR: 1.50; p < 0.01), and heart failure hospitalizations (38.4 vs. 26.5%; HR: 1.59; p < 0.01). Disabling stroke was not statistically significant (10.0 vs. 7.9%; HR: 1.25; p = 0.0558). Delayed patients incurred $36,740 higher health care costs over 3 years ($182,470 vs. $145,730; p < 0.01), driven primarily by increased hospitalizations ($22,127 difference). Results remained significant when restricted to elective procedures only. Delayed TAVR is associated with substantial clinical and economic consequences, including a 50% higher mortality risk and $36,740 in excess costs over 3 years. These findings support the importance of timely intervention and health care system investments to reduce TAVR wait times. • Delayed TAVR beyond 90 days increases 3-year mortality risk by 50% (HR: 1.50). • Delayed treatment results in $36,740 excess health care costs over 3 years. • Heart failure hospitalizations are 59% more likely with delayed TAVR (HR: 1.59). • Adverse outcomes persist even when restricting analysis to elective procedures. • Nearly half of patients experience treatment delays beyond recommended benchmarks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Heart
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shj.2025.100742
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Clinical and Economic Consequences of Delayed Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Shannon Murphy, Seth Clancy, Curtiss Stinis, Sreekanth Vemulapalli et al.
Structural Heart
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

The Clinical and Economic Consequences of Delayed Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Shannon Murphy, Seth Clancy, Curtiss Stinis, Sreekanth Vemulapalli, Soumya Chikermane, Mark J. Russo
article en

Abstract

Delays in access to aortic valve replacement, the recommended treatment for aortic stenosis (AS), is common; however, the impact of this delay is not clearly known. This study aims to examine the clinical and economic consequences of delayed transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with clinically significant AS. We analyzed 4069 patients with clinically significant AS who underwent TAVR between July 2019 and June 2023 using the Optum Market Clarity database. Patients were categorized as timely TAVR (≤90 days from diagnosis) or delayed TAVR (>90 days or urgent/emergent procedure). Clinical outcomes included all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, stroke, and composite endpoints over 3 years. Economic outcomes included total health care costs and hospitalization utilization. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and generalized linear models were used for analysis. Of 4069 patients, 2051 (50.4%) received timely TAVR and 2018 (49.6%) received delayed TAVR. Delayed patients had higher frailty scores (10.9 vs. 8.5; p < 0.01) but similar comorbidity burden. At 3 years, delayed TAVR was associated with significantly higher composite outcomes (50.1 vs. 36.8%; hazard ratio (HR): 1.52; p < 0.01), mortality (19.5 vs. 13.7%; HR: 1.50; p < 0.01), and heart failure hospitalizations (38.4 vs. 26.5%; HR: 1.59; p < 0.01). Disabling stroke was not statistically significant (10.0 vs. 7.9%; HR: 1.25; p = 0.0558). Delayed patients incurred $36,740 higher health care costs over 3 years ($182,470 vs. $145,730; p < 0.01), driven primarily by increased hospitalizations ($22,127 difference). Results remained significant when restricted to elective procedures only. Delayed TAVR is associated with substantial clinical and economic consequences, including a 50% higher mortality risk and $36,740 in excess costs over 3 years. These findings support the importance of timely intervention and health care system investments to reduce TAVR wait times. • Delayed TAVR beyond 90 days increases 3-year mortality risk by 50% (HR: 1.50). • Delayed treatment results in $36,740 excess health care costs over 3 years. • Heart failure hospitalizations are 59% more likely with delayed TAVR (HR: 1.59). • Adverse outcomes persist even when restricting analysis to elective procedures. • Nearly half of patients experience treatment delays beyond recommended benchmarks.

Structural Heart
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Scripps Health (US), Johnson University (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Edwards Lifesciences (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.