Do athletes and coaches do what they know? A mixed-method survey on beliefs and attitudes on drafting in endurance sports

Drafting occurs when athletes follow closely behind another to reduce aerodynamic resistance, lowering their biomechanical, physiological, and psychobiological load. However, it is unclear how aware athletes and coaches are of this advantage and how it is applied in training and competition. The aim of this study was to investigate the beliefs and attitudes of athletes and coaches towards drafting. An online survey was conducted with athletes (N = 236) and coaches (N = 79) active in cycling, skating and running. They answered five items on a Likert scale and answered one open question (“ what is needed for optimal drafting?” ). Thematic analysis revealed six themes, emphasizing the complexity and interpersonal nature of the drafting skill. Overall, 91.3% of respondents agreed that drafting can improve sports performance (60.5% strongly agree), while only 1.7% strongly disagreed. Yet, few indicated that they regularly worked on improving their drafting skills in training (16.4%). There was a moderate correlation between awareness and training on drafting, for athletes ( r s = 0.31, p < 0.001) and coaches ( r s = 0.35, p < 0.05). The findings demonstrate that athletes and coaches are generally aware of the advantages of drafting and recognise it as an important, complex and multifaceted skill. Yet, paradoxically, only few see value in exploring and improving this skill during training. This study highlights a critical gap between theoretical understanding and practical application, revealing a missed opportunity in athlete development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251386161
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Doping in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do athletes and coaches do what they know? A mixed-method survey on beliefs and attitudes on drafting in endurance sports

Floor A.P. van den Brandt, Florentina J. Hettinga, Stein Gerrit Paul Menting, Barbara Huijgen et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Doping in Sports
4.20
article

Do athletes and coaches do what they know? A mixed-method survey on beliefs and attitudes on drafting in endurance sports

Floor A.P. van den Brandt, Florentina J. Hettinga, Stein Gerrit Paul Menting, Barbara Huijgen, Marije Titia Elferink-Gemser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Drafting occurs when athletes follow closely behind another to reduce aerodynamic resistance, lowering their biomechanical, physiological, and psychobiological load. However, it is unclear how aware athletes and coaches are of this advantage and how it is applied in training and competition. The aim of this study was to investigate the beliefs and attitudes of athletes and coaches towards drafting. An online survey was conducted with athletes (N = 236) and coaches (N = 79) active in cycling, skating and running. They answered five items on a Likert scale and answered one open question (“ what is needed for optimal drafting?” ). Thematic analysis revealed six themes, emphasizing the complexity and interpersonal nature of the drafting skill. Overall, 91.3% of respondents agreed that drafting can improve sports performance (60.5% strongly agree), while only 1.7% strongly disagreed. Yet, few indicated that they regularly worked on improving their drafting skills in training (16.4%). There was a moderate correlation between awareness and training on drafting, for athletes ( r s = 0.31, p < 0.001) and coaches ( r s = 0.35, p < 0.05). The findings demonstrate that athletes and coaches are generally aware of the advantages of drafting and recognise it as an important, complex and multifaceted skill. Yet, paradoxically, only few see value in exploring and improving this skill during training. This study highlights a critical gap between theoretical understanding and practical application, revealing a missed opportunity in athlete development.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Ulster (GB), University of Groningen (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Doping in Sports
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.