Minds at Work: A Design for an Experimental Approach to Assessing Cognitive Abilities in Construction

The construction industry relies heavily on the cognitive abilities of its workforce to manage intricate tasks and ensure project success. Research indicates that when the cognitive demands of tasks outweigh workers’ cognitive capabilities, this imbalance can significantly compromise worker performance and safety. Consequently, it is crucial to understand workers’ cognitive capabilities and assign tasks accordingly. However, existing cognitive assessment techniques might be limited when applied in the construction context due to dynamic construction site conditions and the absence of task complexity considerations. To address these gaps, this research designed standardized experimental procedures for assessing construction professionals’ cognitive abilities and calibrating construction task complexity using a design of experiments approach. Four key cognitive abilities were assessed through a combination of cognitive tests and wearable sensors. Pilot testing demonstrated that the designed experimental procedures successfully captured participants’ cognitive states, stress levels, and performance across varying complexity levels. Performance scores peaked at moderate complexity, consistent with the inverted U hypothesis, while stress and cognitive load increased with task complexity. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) survey results supported this trend, with participants reporting increased mental and temporal demands, frustration, and effort as task complexity increased. These findings confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of the designed dual-method procedure in construction-related cognitive assessment. This study advances knowledge by introducing the first construction-specific experimental protocol that integrates cognitive testing and sensor-based monitoring while accounting for task complexity. The proposed approach enables objective evaluation of cognitive fitness for construction roles, offering a foundation for practical applications in workforce planning, training, and safety management. Future work will involve deeper analysis of sensor-collected data to develop predictive models and scalable field applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-16638
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minds at Work: A Design for an Experimental Approach to Assessing Cognitive Abilities in Construction

Lynn Shehab, Gaang Lee, Farook Hamzeh
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Minds at Work: A Design for an Experimental Approach to Assessing Cognitive Abilities in Construction

Lynn Shehab, Gaang Lee, Farook Hamzeh
article en

Abstract

The construction industry relies heavily on the cognitive abilities of its workforce to manage intricate tasks and ensure project success. Research indicates that when the cognitive demands of tasks outweigh workers’ cognitive capabilities, this imbalance can significantly compromise worker performance and safety. Consequently, it is crucial to understand workers’ cognitive capabilities and assign tasks accordingly. However, existing cognitive assessment techniques might be limited when applied in the construction context due to dynamic construction site conditions and the absence of task complexity considerations. To address these gaps, this research designed standardized experimental procedures for assessing construction professionals’ cognitive abilities and calibrating construction task complexity using a design of experiments approach. Four key cognitive abilities were assessed through a combination of cognitive tests and wearable sensors. Pilot testing demonstrated that the designed experimental procedures successfully captured participants’ cognitive states, stress levels, and performance across varying complexity levels. Performance scores peaked at moderate complexity, consistent with the inverted U hypothesis, while stress and cognitive load increased with task complexity. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) survey results supported this trend, with participants reporting increased mental and temporal demands, frustration, and effort as task complexity increased. These findings confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of the designed dual-method procedure in construction-related cognitive assessment. This study advances knowledge by introducing the first construction-specific experimental protocol that integrates cognitive testing and sensor-based monitoring while accounting for task complexity. The proposed approach enables objective evaluation of cognitive fitness for construction roles, offering a foundation for practical applications in workforce planning, training, and safety management. Future work will involve deeper analysis of sensor-collected data to develop predictive models and scalable field applications.

Journal of Construction Engineering and ManagementVol. 152(1)
University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.