Barriers and enablers in knowledge transfer in projects: a systematic literature review

Purpose This paper aims to identify the barriers and enablers for knowledge transfer (KT) in projects. Design/methodology/approach Systematic literature review was carried out, using the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The analysis of the research corpus, composed of 372 articles, was selected with the help of Rayyan platform. The reading and categorisation of the content of the articles was carried out with the support of spreadsheets and text editors. Findings The findings indicate that organisations should design and implement KT strategies that holistically integrate barriers and enablers within project environments. These factors can be classified into organisational, behavioural and technological dimensions, which should not be treated as isolated categories but as interconnected elements requiring careful consideration to support effective strategies for KT both within and across projects. Originality/value This paper identifies behavioural, organisational and technological dimensions as integrated categories for analysing both the barriers and enablers of KT within project environments. Integrating these dimensions fosters innovation, learning and effective problem-solving. Framing KT as a strategic organisational capability contrast with perspectives that view it solely as an individual or organisational behaviour, or as a purely operational process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-02-2025-0051
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and enablers in knowledge transfer in projects: a systematic literature review

Luciano Ferreira da Silva, Fernando Antônio Ribeiro Serra, Isabel Cristina Scafuto, Lara Gomes
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

Barriers and enablers in knowledge transfer in projects: a systematic literature review

Luciano Ferreira da Silva, Fernando Antônio Ribeiro Serra, Isabel Cristina Scafuto, Lara Gomes
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to identify the barriers and enablers for knowledge transfer (KT) in projects. Design/methodology/approach Systematic literature review was carried out, using the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The analysis of the research corpus, composed of 372 articles, was selected with the help of Rayyan platform. The reading and categorisation of the content of the articles was carried out with the support of spreadsheets and text editors. Findings The findings indicate that organisations should design and implement KT strategies that holistically integrate barriers and enablers within project environments. These factors can be classified into organisational, behavioural and technological dimensions, which should not be treated as isolated categories but as interconnected elements requiring careful consideration to support effective strategies for KT both within and across projects. Originality/value This paper identifies behavioural, organisational and technological dimensions as integrated categories for analysing both the barriers and enablers of KT within project environments. Integrating these dimensions fosters innovation, learning and effective problem-solving. Framing KT as a strategic organisational capability contrast with perspectives that view it solely as an individual or organisational behaviour, or as a purely operational process.

VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management SystemsVol. 56(2)
Universidade Nove de Julho (BR), Institute of Biomedical Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.