A simple nomogram tool for predicting fetal chromosomal abnormalities based on ultrasound soft markers: a research note

We retrospectively analyzed 565 pregnancies with USMs who underwent amniocentesis between 2016 and 2024. Our nomogram integrated six readily available clinical factors: maternal age, thickened nuchal translucency, adverse pregnancy history, structural malformations, fetal growth restriction, and short long bones. The tool demonstrated moderate discriminatory ability with an AUC of 0.738 (95% CI 0.652-0.823) in the training set and 0.647 (95% CI 0.511-0.784) in the validation set. Calibration curves confirmed good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. Rather than discovering new associations between USMs and chromosomal abnormalities, this tool simply converts established clinical knowledge into a user-friendly format that allows clinicians to objectively assess the need for amniocentesis in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Research Notes
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07512-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A simple nomogram tool for predicting fetal chromosomal abnormalities based on ultrasound soft markers: a research note

Ming Lei, Xuefei Yu, Xiumei Li, Chen Jin et al.
1 citations
BMC Research Notes
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
3.49
article

A simple nomogram tool for predicting fetal chromosomal abnormalities based on ultrasound soft markers: a research note

Ming Lei, Xuefei Yu, Xiumei Li, Chen Jin, Ping Deng, Wei Jiang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We retrospectively analyzed 565 pregnancies with USMs who underwent amniocentesis between 2016 and 2024. Our nomogram integrated six readily available clinical factors: maternal age, thickened nuchal translucency, adverse pregnancy history, structural malformations, fetal growth restriction, and short long bones. The tool demonstrated moderate discriminatory ability with an AUC of 0.738 (95% CI 0.652-0.823) in the training set and 0.647 (95% CI 0.511-0.784) in the validation set. Calibration curves confirmed good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. Rather than discovering new associations between USMs and chromosomal abnormalities, this tool simply converts established clinical knowledge into a user-friendly format that allows clinicians to objectively assess the need for amniocentesis in clinical practice.

BMC Research NotesVol. 18(1)
Jilin University (CN), Jilin Province Tumor Hospital (CN), Changchun Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (CN), Changchun 208 Hospital (CN), Sixth Hospital of Changchun City (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.