The Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel under the Massiah Line of Cases

The sixth amendment guarantees to the accused in a criminal prosecution the right "to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence." In Massiah v. United States, the Supreme Court held this right was violated when there was used against the defendant at trial evidence of incriminating statements deliberately elicited from him by an informant after he had been indicted and in the absence of counsel. In effect, this decision and others that 'followed have created a new constitutional right not to be questioned about pending charges prior to trial except in the presence of an attorney. One consequence of the Massiah line of cases is that federal and state investigators may not use otherwise legitimate investigative methods to obtain incriminating statements from a person once he has been charged with a crime. Another is that federal and state prosecutors may not introduce at trial probative, reliable, and voluntary admissions of guilt by the defendant. The overall result is that the search for truth in criminal investigations and trials is thwarted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.22.3.4.sixth
Primary Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel under the Massiah Line of Cases

Department of Justice Office of Legal Policy
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
article

The Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel under the Massiah Line of Cases

Department of Justice Office of Legal Policy
article en

Abstract

The sixth amendment guarantees to the accused in a criminal prosecution the right "to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence." In Massiah v. United States, the Supreme Court held this right was violated when there was used against the defendant at trial evidence of incriminating statements deliberately elicited from him by an informant after he had been indicted and in the absence of counsel. In effect, this decision and others that 'followed have created a new constitutional right not to be questioned about pending charges prior to trial except in the presence of an attorney. One consequence of the Massiah line of cases is that federal and state investigators may not use otherwise legitimate investigative methods to obtain incriminating statements from a person once he has been charged with a crime. Another is that federal and state prosecutors may not introduce at trial probative, reliable, and voluntary admissions of guilt by the defendant. The overall result is that the search for truth in criminal investigations and trials is thwarted.

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform(22.3.4)
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel under the Massiah Line of Cases — Department of Justice Office of Legal Policy · University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS