Tight lower bounds for block-structured integer programs

Abstract We study fundamental block-structured integer programs called tree-fold and multi-stage IPs. Tree-fold IPs have a constraint matrix with independent blocks linked together by few constraints in a recursive pattern. Transposing this constraint matrix yields the constraint matrix of multi-stage IPs. The state-of-the-art algorithms to solve these IPs have an exponential gap in their running times, making it natural to ask whether this gap is inherent. We answer this question in the affirmative. Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, we prove lower bounds showing that the exponential difference is necessary. This also proves that the known algorithms are essentially optimal. Moreover, we prove unconditional lower bounds on the size of the Graver basis elements, a fundamental building block of all known algorithms to solve these IPs. This shows that none of the current approaches can be improved beyond this bound unconditionally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematical Programming
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-025-02296-z
Primary Topic
Advanced Graph Theory Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tight lower bounds for block-structured integer programs

Kim-Manuel Klein, Martin Koutecký, Alexandra Lassota, Christoph Hunkenschröder et al.
Mathematical Programming
Advanced Graph Theory Research
article

Tight lower bounds for block-structured integer programs

Kim-Manuel Klein, Martin Koutecký, Alexandra Lassota, Christoph Hunkenschröder, Asaf Levin
article en

Abstract

Abstract We study fundamental block-structured integer programs called tree-fold and multi-stage IPs. Tree-fold IPs have a constraint matrix with independent blocks linked together by few constraints in a recursive pattern. Transposing this constraint matrix yields the constraint matrix of multi-stage IPs. The state-of-the-art algorithms to solve these IPs have an exponential gap in their running times, making it natural to ask whether this gap is inherent. We answer this question in the affirmative. Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, we prove lower bounds showing that the exponential difference is necessary. This also proves that the known algorithms are essentially optimal. Moreover, we prove unconditional lower bounds on the size of the Graver basis elements, a fundamental building block of all known algorithms to solve these IPs. This shows that none of the current approaches can be improved beyond this bound unconditionally.

Mathematical Programming
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Charles University (CZ), Berlin Mathematical School (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), University of Lübeck (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Advanced Graph Theory Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tight lower bounds for block-structured integer programs — Kim-Manuel Klein, Martin Koutecký, et al. · Mathematical Programming (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS