Do free healthcare policies play a role in expanding national health insurance enrollment among informal sector workers? The case of the Afya Care pilot program in Kenya

Several Sub-Saharan African countries have transitioned from fiscally unsustainable free healthcare policies to national health insurance schemes. These national schemes often expect informal sector workers to contribute directly to the scheme. Although enrollment in the national scheme is critical to achieving universal health coverage, informal sector workers’ inclusion remains challenging. In this paper, using the case of the Afya-Care free healthcare policy pilot in Kenya, we examine an issue that has thus far received limited attention in the literature: the extent to which earlier exposure to free healthcare policies shapes later informal sector workers’ decisions to enrol and contribute to a public health insurance scheme. We used nationally representative repeated cross-sectional household data collected among informal sector workers in Kenya in 2018 and 2020 before and after the Afya Care-free healthcare pilot, respectively. Using a sample of 6900 informal sector workers, we constructed a pre-and-post quasi-experimental design applying difference-in-differences estimation modelling to assess the effect of exposure to the Afya-Care free healthcare policy pilot on individuals' decisions to enrol later in the national health insurance scheme. No Difference was observed between the two groups before intervention. However, after the intervention, our findings show a 10.5% difference in national health insurance scheme enrollment between the control and intervention groups (p < 0.001). Individuals in the intervention counties had a 65% greater probability of enrolling in the national health insurance scheme than did those in the control counties (odds ratio -1.65; p = 0.07; 95% CI—0.96- 2.83). Heterogeneity analysis revealed a significant increase in enrollment in the intervention group by 30% and 18% among the least educated and among the poorest individuals, respectively. Our findings suggest that exposure to the Afya Care-free healthcare policy favoured the decision to enrol in the national health insurance scheme and enhanced equity. However, registration in the scheme remains low. Increased enrollment is likely to follow only from an enhanced government commitment to improve information campaigns to boost awareness, to expand subsidies to increase premium affordability, especially among low-income informal sector workers, and to subsidise those who cannot afford to pay.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24760-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do free healthcare policies play a role in expanding national health insurance enrollment among informal sector workers? The case of the Afya Care pilot program in Kenya

Manuela De Allegri, MaryBennah N Kuloba, Phidelis Wamalwa, Boniface Mbuthia et al.
1 citations
BMC Public Health
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
2.21
article

Do free healthcare policies play a role in expanding national health insurance enrollment among informal sector workers? The case of the Afya Care pilot program in Kenya

Manuela De Allegri, MaryBennah N Kuloba, Phidelis Wamalwa, Boniface Mbuthia, Christoph Strupat, Edmund Yeboah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Several Sub-Saharan African countries have transitioned from fiscally unsustainable free healthcare policies to national health insurance schemes. These national schemes often expect informal sector workers to contribute directly to the scheme. Although enrollment in the national scheme is critical to achieving universal health coverage, informal sector workers’ inclusion remains challenging. In this paper, using the case of the Afya-Care free healthcare policy pilot in Kenya, we examine an issue that has thus far received limited attention in the literature: the extent to which earlier exposure to free healthcare policies shapes later informal sector workers’ decisions to enrol and contribute to a public health insurance scheme. We used nationally representative repeated cross-sectional household data collected among informal sector workers in Kenya in 2018 and 2020 before and after the Afya Care-free healthcare pilot, respectively. Using a sample of 6900 informal sector workers, we constructed a pre-and-post quasi-experimental design applying difference-in-differences estimation modelling to assess the effect of exposure to the Afya-Care free healthcare policy pilot on individuals' decisions to enrol later in the national health insurance scheme. No Difference was observed between the two groups before intervention. However, after the intervention, our findings show a 10.5% difference in national health insurance scheme enrollment between the control and intervention groups (p < 0.001). Individuals in the intervention counties had a 65% greater probability of enrolling in the national health insurance scheme than did those in the control counties (odds ratio -1.65; p = 0.07; 95% CI—0.96- 2.83). Heterogeneity analysis revealed a significant increase in enrollment in the intervention group by 30% and 18% among the least educated and among the poorest individuals, respectively. Our findings suggest that exposure to the Afya Care-free healthcare policy favoured the decision to enrol in the national health insurance scheme and enhanced equity. However, registration in the scheme remains low. Increased enrollment is likely to follow only from an enhanced government commitment to improve information campaigns to boost awareness, to expand subsidies to increase premium affordability, especially among low-income informal sector workers, and to subsidise those who cannot afford to pay.

BMC Public HealthVol. 25(1)
German Institute of Development and Sustainability (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Amref Health Africa (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.