Robot kinematic parameter error calibration based on Levenberg–Marquardt and artificial rabbits optimization algorithm

Positioning accuracy of the robot is generally improved by using the calibration method. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm is treated as the typical algorithm for robot calibration, which exists as the rounding error and then restricts further improvement of its calibration accuracy. Therefore, this paper proposes a calibration method based on Levenberg-Marquardt and artificial rabbits optimization algorithm. First, the kinematic error model of the robot is established by the modified Denavit-Hartenberg model. Second, the robot kinematic parameter errors are initially calibrated using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Third, these errors from the initial calibration are brought into the artificial rabbits optimization algorithm and accurately calibrated by the artificial rabbits optimization algorithm to obtain the optimal values and compensated into the robot kinematic error model. Finally, the simulation, calibration, and validation experiments are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed calibration method and to compare the advantages of other methods. After calibration by the Levenberg-Marquardt and artificial rabbits optimization algorithm, the mean positioning error is reduced from 1.6348 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.4509-1.8187 mm) to 0.0244 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.0220-0.0268 mm) for the simulation experiments and from 0.8303 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.7341-0.9265 mm) to 0.1636 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.1485-0.1787 mm) for the validation experiments. In the application scenario experiment of measuring a standard ring gauge, the measurement error is reduced from 0.1239 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.1067-0.1411 mm) to 0.0623 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.0548-0.0698 mm). This method can more accurately calibrate the robot kinematic parameter error and significantly improve the accuracy level of the robot.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Scientific Instruments
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0252537
Primary Topic
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robot kinematic parameter error calibration based on Levenberg–Marquardt and artificial rabbits optimization algorithm

Mengyao Fan, Haojie Xia, Fei Zhang, Huining Zhao et al.
Review of Scientific Instruments
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
article

Robot kinematic parameter error calibration based on Levenberg–Marquardt and artificial rabbits optimization algorithm

Mengyao Fan, Haojie Xia, Fei Zhang, Huining Zhao, Fei Liu
article en

Abstract

Positioning accuracy of the robot is generally improved by using the calibration method. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm is treated as the typical algorithm for robot calibration, which exists as the rounding error and then restricts further improvement of its calibration accuracy. Therefore, this paper proposes a calibration method based on Levenberg-Marquardt and artificial rabbits optimization algorithm. First, the kinematic error model of the robot is established by the modified Denavit-Hartenberg model. Second, the robot kinematic parameter errors are initially calibrated using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Third, these errors from the initial calibration are brought into the artificial rabbits optimization algorithm and accurately calibrated by the artificial rabbits optimization algorithm to obtain the optimal values and compensated into the robot kinematic error model. Finally, the simulation, calibration, and validation experiments are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed calibration method and to compare the advantages of other methods. After calibration by the Levenberg-Marquardt and artificial rabbits optimization algorithm, the mean positioning error is reduced from 1.6348 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.4509-1.8187 mm) to 0.0244 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.0220-0.0268 mm) for the simulation experiments and from 0.8303 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.7341-0.9265 mm) to 0.1636 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.1485-0.1787 mm) for the validation experiments. In the application scenario experiment of measuring a standard ring gauge, the measurement error is reduced from 0.1239 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.1067-0.1411 mm) to 0.0623 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.0548-0.0698 mm). This method can more accurately calibrate the robot kinematic parameter error and significantly improve the accuracy level of the robot.

Review of Scientific InstrumentsVol. 96(10)
Hefei University of Technology (CN), Hefei University (CN), JAC Motors (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.