A comparative analysis of initial-pose self-calibration algorithms for underactuated cable-driven parallel robots

Abstract Underactuated Cable-Driven Parallel Robots ( UACDPRs ) typically rely on relative internal sensors to estimate the end-effector ( EE ) state. Therefore, at startup, the reference values of the quantities measured by these sensors are unknown, and so is the initial pose of the EE . The problem of determining the reference values of the internal sensors is called initial-pose self-calibration. The latter is often formulated as an overdetermined system of nonlinear equations and solved using nonlinear weighted least-squares methods, minimizing the error between modeled and measured variables, and its effectiveness is highly influenced by the choice of measurement configurations, as well as the motion planning and control strategy used to reach them. This work presents two practical data acquisition methods for initial-pose self-calibration of UACDPRs , aiming to reduce the overall time required by the procedure and enhance process automation. The first method is slower but richer in data, as it relies on equilibrium poses and, therefore, can leverage cable-tension data, whereas the second method is faster and is based on geometric constraints only. The performance of the methods is evaluated in terms of acquisition time, number of measurements, and calibration accuracy on a 4-cable UACDPR prototype. The results highlight the merits and shortcomings of both methods, namely, trade-offs between the velocity of data collection and the precision of pose estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Robotica
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0263574725102804
Primary Topic
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of initial-pose self-calibration algorithms for underactuated cable-driven parallel robots

Marco Carricato, Edoardo Idà, Filippo Zoffoli
Robotica
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
article

A comparative analysis of initial-pose self-calibration algorithms for underactuated cable-driven parallel robots

Marco Carricato, Edoardo Idà, Filippo Zoffoli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Underactuated Cable-Driven Parallel Robots ( UACDPRs ) typically rely on relative internal sensors to estimate the end-effector ( EE ) state. Therefore, at startup, the reference values of the quantities measured by these sensors are unknown, and so is the initial pose of the EE . The problem of determining the reference values of the internal sensors is called initial-pose self-calibration. The latter is often formulated as an overdetermined system of nonlinear equations and solved using nonlinear weighted least-squares methods, minimizing the error between modeled and measured variables, and its effectiveness is highly influenced by the choice of measurement configurations, as well as the motion planning and control strategy used to reach them. This work presents two practical data acquisition methods for initial-pose self-calibration of UACDPRs , aiming to reduce the overall time required by the procedure and enhance process automation. The first method is slower but richer in data, as it relies on equilibrium poses and, therefore, can leverage cable-tension data, whereas the second method is faster and is based on geometric constraints only. The performance of the methods is evaluated in terms of acquisition time, number of measurements, and calibration accuracy on a 4-cable UACDPR prototype. The results highlight the merits and shortcomings of both methods, namely, trade-offs between the velocity of data collection and the precision of pose estimation.

RoboticaVol. 43(11)
University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.