Time Windows Used when Identifying Current Drug Use and Polypharmacy

Background There is no consensus on the definition of the prevalence of drug use, including polypharmacy, regarding the length of the time window and the number of required concomitant medications. Objectives We aim to explore how the estimated prevalence of drug use in general, and of polypharmacy in particular, is affected by the applied definition. Methods We conducted a drug-utilization study divided into two parts: in the first part, we focused on estimation of current use, corresponding to ‘baseline drug use’ in a cohort study. Using population-based registries from Denmark, we identified a cohort of individuals aged ≥18 years during 2020-2022, assigned them a random index date and considered ‘current use’ of the following drugs: statins, glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), opioids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The second part of the study focused on polypharmacy, defined according to five different definitions, with estimations of its prevalence using population-based registries from Denmark. We identified a cohort of individuals older than 65 years in 2022, and we considered all drugs available in the registries except for anti-infectives for systemic use. We also evaluated the accuracy of different criteria for predicting polypharmacy using simulations. Results Evaluating baseline drug use, we observed that the proportion of individuals classified as exposed increased with use of time-windows up to the first 90 days before the index date, reaching a plateau using windows around 120-150 days for statins, GLDs, and SSRIs, and around 180-300 days for opioids, whereas it was not reached for NSAIDs within 360 days. The prevalence of polypharmacy ranged from 21.1% (10 different 4th level Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) groups in one year) to 92.3% (two different 4th level ATC groups in one year) depending on the applied definition, varying with the number of different ATC groups and time periods. In the simulation, the best criterion for identifying polypharmacy required at least two dispensations for each of at least five drugs, with sensitivity ranging between 0.93 and 1.00, and specificity between 0.72 and 1.00. Conclusions Time windows up to 90 days are too short to identify baseline drug use in the Danish setting. How polypharmacy is defined significantly influences its estimate, suggesting a need to use multiple definitions in each study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54103/2282-0930/29216
Primary Topic
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time Windows Used when Identifying Current Drug Use and Polypharmacy

Sabrina Giometto, Mette Reilev, Henrik Støvring, Anton Pottegård et al.
Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
article

Time Windows Used when Identifying Current Drug Use and Polypharmacy

Sabrina Giometto, Mette Reilev, Henrik Støvring, Anton Pottegård, Einar Thomsen
article en

Abstract

Background There is no consensus on the definition of the prevalence of drug use, including polypharmacy, regarding the length of the time window and the number of required concomitant medications. Objectives We aim to explore how the estimated prevalence of drug use in general, and of polypharmacy in particular, is affected by the applied definition. Methods We conducted a drug-utilization study divided into two parts: in the first part, we focused on estimation of current use, corresponding to ‘baseline drug use’ in a cohort study. Using population-based registries from Denmark, we identified a cohort of individuals aged ≥18 years during 2020-2022, assigned them a random index date and considered ‘current use’ of the following drugs: statins, glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), opioids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The second part of the study focused on polypharmacy, defined according to five different definitions, with estimations of its prevalence using population-based registries from Denmark. We identified a cohort of individuals older than 65 years in 2022, and we considered all drugs available in the registries except for anti-infectives for systemic use. We also evaluated the accuracy of different criteria for predicting polypharmacy using simulations. Results Evaluating baseline drug use, we observed that the proportion of individuals classified as exposed increased with use of time-windows up to the first 90 days before the index date, reaching a plateau using windows around 120-150 days for statins, GLDs, and SSRIs, and around 180-300 days for opioids, whereas it was not reached for NSAIDs within 360 days. The prevalence of polypharmacy ranged from 21.1% (10 different 4th level Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) groups in one year) to 92.3% (two different 4th level ATC groups in one year) depending on the applied definition, varying with the number of different ATC groups and time periods. In the simulation, the best criterion for identifying polypharmacy required at least two dispensations for each of at least five drugs, with sensitivity ranging between 0.93 and 1.00, and specificity between 0.72 and 1.00. Conclusions Time windows up to 90 days are too short to identify baseline drug use in the Danish setting. How polypharmacy is defined significantly influences its estimate, suggesting a need to use multiple definitions in each study.

Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
University of Pisa (IT), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.