Maritime language lecturers’ perceptions of curricular framework

Abstract The study investigates how seven language lecturers in Norwegian maritime officer education interpret and enact the curricular framework governing Maritime English and Norwegian Communication. Using Fairclough’s three-dimensional Critical Discourse Analysis, the STCW Code and IMO Model Course 3.17 Maritime English, alongside national course plans and semi-structured interviews with language lecturers, are examined. Findings reveal a persistent tension between an international, technical-rational safety discourse and broader pedagogical aims. Lecturers translate extensive and sometimes vague requirements into workable plans; time and standardisation pressures encourage procedural, test-oriented teaching, even as lecturers seek deeper literacy learning and higher status for the language courses. The study argues for closer alignment of safety-critical LSP outcomes with expansive literacy goals, and programme-level guidance to support coherent implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-025-00393-6
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maritime language lecturers’ perceptions of curricular framework

Trude Amundsen
WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Maritime language lecturers’ perceptions of curricular framework

Trude Amundsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract The study investigates how seven language lecturers in Norwegian maritime officer education interpret and enact the curricular framework governing Maritime English and Norwegian Communication. Using Fairclough’s three-dimensional Critical Discourse Analysis, the STCW Code and IMO Model Course 3.17 Maritime English, alongside national course plans and semi-structured interviews with language lecturers, are examined. Findings reveal a persistent tension between an international, technical-rational safety discourse and broader pedagogical aims. Lecturers translate extensive and sometimes vague requirements into workable plans; time and standardisation pressures encourage procedural, test-oriented teaching, even as lecturers seek deeper literacy learning and higher status for the language courses. The study argues for closer alignment of safety-critical LSP outcomes with expansive literacy goals, and programme-level guidance to support coherent implementation.

WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Maritime language lecturers’ perceptions of curricular framework — Trude Amundsen · WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS