Towards reliable prevalence estimates for chronic conditions: a data linkage study

Abstract Background Reliable prevalence estimates of chronic conditions are essential for understanding population health, and developing guidelines and policy to keep healthcare affordable and sustainable. Electronic health records (EHR) from general practitioners (GPs) and claims data from health insurers are increasingly used for this purpose in the Netherlands. But to what extent do these sources complement each other? We investigated the degree of overlap and complementation between two data sources for prevalence estimates of chronic conditions. Methods EHR data from 919,619 patients of GPs participating in the Nivel Primary Care Database were linked at the individual level to claims data available at the National Healthcare Institute. Standardized prevalence estimates per 1,000 patients for 35 chronic conditions were calculated for 2019, based on single sources and combined. Subsequently, the percentage of overlap and complementation between prevalence estimates from both data sources was calculated. Results For all 35 conditions, the combined prevalence was higher than that based on a single data source. Overlap varied per chronic condition, ranging from 6% (chronic shoulder complaints) to 92% (diabetes mellitus). Of all identified cases per condition, EHR data complements claims data between 4% (AIDS/HIV) and 83% (liver diseases), while claims data complements EHR data between 1% (diabetes mellitus) and 54% (migraine). Conclusions Data linkage between EHR and claims data results in higher prevalence estimates for chronic conditions, but the extent to which data sources complement each other differs strongly per condition. These findings offer valuable insights to researchers and healthcare policymakers for improving the reliability of prevalence estimates and supporting the development of sustainable healthcare policies. Key messages • These findings imply that researchers and healthcare policymakers should be aware that epidemiologic measures based on a single data source could be an underestimation. • These findings indicate that, depending on the chronic condition, data linkage of EHR and claims data could provide added value for informing sustainable healthcare policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1824
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards reliable prevalence estimates for chronic conditions: a data linkage study

İpek Arslan, Joost W. Vanhommerig, Andrew Wong, J Bes et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Towards reliable prevalence estimates for chronic conditions: a data linkage study

İpek Arslan, Joost W. Vanhommerig, Andrew Wong, J Bes, Robert Verheij, C. van Dijk
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Reliable prevalence estimates of chronic conditions are essential for understanding population health, and developing guidelines and policy to keep healthcare affordable and sustainable. Electronic health records (EHR) from general practitioners (GPs) and claims data from health insurers are increasingly used for this purpose in the Netherlands. But to what extent do these sources complement each other? We investigated the degree of overlap and complementation between two data sources for prevalence estimates of chronic conditions. Methods EHR data from 919,619 patients of GPs participating in the Nivel Primary Care Database were linked at the individual level to claims data available at the National Healthcare Institute. Standardized prevalence estimates per 1,000 patients for 35 chronic conditions were calculated for 2019, based on single sources and combined. Subsequently, the percentage of overlap and complementation between prevalence estimates from both data sources was calculated. Results For all 35 conditions, the combined prevalence was higher than that based on a single data source. Overlap varied per chronic condition, ranging from 6% (chronic shoulder complaints) to 92% (diabetes mellitus). Of all identified cases per condition, EHR data complements claims data between 4% (AIDS/HIV) and 83% (liver diseases), while claims data complements EHR data between 1% (diabetes mellitus) and 54% (migraine). Conclusions Data linkage between EHR and claims data results in higher prevalence estimates for chronic conditions, but the extent to which data sources complement each other differs strongly per condition. These findings offer valuable insights to researchers and healthcare policymakers for improving the reliability of prevalence estimates and supporting the development of sustainable healthcare policies. Key messages • These findings imply that researchers and healthcare policymakers should be aware that epidemiologic measures based on a single data source could be an underestimation. • These findings indicate that, depending on the chronic condition, data linkage of EHR and claims data could provide added value for informing sustainable healthcare policy.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Tilburg University (NL), National Health Care Institute (NL), Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL), Siemens Healthineers (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.