Neighbourhood greenness and mental well-being: A spatial-scale analysis in two German cities, 2024

Abstract Increasing urbanization poses significant challenges to the mental health of urban populations. Urban green spaces are known to support mental well-being by reducing stress, promoting physical activity, and fostering social interaction. However, empirical evidence on the relationship between green infrastructure and mental health remains inconsistent, partly due to methodological differences, study area characteristics and spatial scales. In selected districts of two German cities, a random sample was drawn from the local population registers, with 2,157 residents providing georeferenced residential data for the analysis. The association between greenness, measured by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and mental wellbeing, assessed using the WHO-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5), was examined at neighbourhood level across different spatial scales. Sociodemographic factors such as gender, age, and monthly net household income were included. The mean WHO-5 score in the sample was 14.52 (SD: 4.78). NDVI values typically ranged from around 0.17 at small scales (10-25 m) to around 0.28 at larger scales (700-1,000 m). A significant association was found between NDVI and WHO-5 at small spatial scales (β = 2.97 at 10 m; β = 2.42 at 25 m) and again at larger scales (β = 2.18 at 700 m; β = 3.26 at 1,000 m), but no significant associations were observed at intermediate spatial scales (50-600 meters), with coefficients ranging from 0.30 to 1.72 and no consistent pattern. This suggests a U-shaped relationship between spatial scale and effect strength. The results indicate that while the NDVI and sociodemographic data provides valuable insights, they do not fully capture the complexity of human-environment interactions. Future studies should consider incorporating qualitative data, such as individual experiences and perceptions of green space quality, to deepen the understanding of the relationship between green infrastructure and mental health. Key messages • Mental well-being is linked to greenness at very small and large spatial scales, showing a U-shaped relationship. • Combining NDVI with additional variables provides a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of green spaces on mental well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1319
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neighbourhood greenness and mental well-being: A spatial-scale analysis in two German cities, 2024

Thomas Kistemann, Johanna Grünewald, Torkel Falkenberg, Nico T. Mutters
European Journal of Public Health
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Neighbourhood greenness and mental well-being: A spatial-scale analysis in two German cities, 2024

Thomas Kistemann, Johanna Grünewald, Torkel Falkenberg, Nico T. Mutters
article en

Abstract

Abstract Increasing urbanization poses significant challenges to the mental health of urban populations. Urban green spaces are known to support mental well-being by reducing stress, promoting physical activity, and fostering social interaction. However, empirical evidence on the relationship between green infrastructure and mental health remains inconsistent, partly due to methodological differences, study area characteristics and spatial scales. In selected districts of two German cities, a random sample was drawn from the local population registers, with 2,157 residents providing georeferenced residential data for the analysis. The association between greenness, measured by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and mental wellbeing, assessed using the WHO-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5), was examined at neighbourhood level across different spatial scales. Sociodemographic factors such as gender, age, and monthly net household income were included. The mean WHO-5 score in the sample was 14.52 (SD: 4.78). NDVI values typically ranged from around 0.17 at small scales (10-25 m) to around 0.28 at larger scales (700-1,000 m). A significant association was found between NDVI and WHO-5 at small spatial scales (β = 2.97 at 10 m; β = 2.42 at 25 m) and again at larger scales (β = 2.18 at 700 m; β = 3.26 at 1,000 m), but no significant associations were observed at intermediate spatial scales (50-600 meters), with coefficients ranging from 0.30 to 1.72 and no consistent pattern. This suggests a U-shaped relationship between spatial scale and effect strength. The results indicate that while the NDVI and sociodemographic data provides valuable insights, they do not fully capture the complexity of human-environment interactions. Future studies should consider incorporating qualitative data, such as individual experiences and perceptions of green space quality, to deepen the understanding of the relationship between green infrastructure and mental health. Key messages • Mental well-being is linked to greenness at very small and large spatial scales, showing a U-shaped relationship. • Combining NDVI with additional variables provides a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of green spaces on mental well-being.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.