Using Behavioural Science for Infodemic Preparedness: The Case of Vaccination Misinformation

Abstract Worldwide at least 154 million lives were saved due to vaccination in the last five decades alone. However, the spread of vaccination mis- and disinformation remains a threat to the success of vaccinations by increasing vaccine hesitancy, that is, an individual's decision to delay or refuse available, recommended vaccinations. Moreover, changes in the global political climate threaten funding for national and international vaccination programmes and campaigns. The changes are often justified by repeating common misinformation such as the alleged link between measles vaccinations and autism. Given these global challenges and developments, it is questionable whether the global community is better prepared for a future pandemic than before the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this development, the scientific community has gathered knowledge and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic that help to prepare for future outbreaks if implemented. In this presentation I will focus on three key lessons from the COVID-19 era on how to better approach vaccination misinformation and strengthen pandemic preparedness: implementation of a) effective measures to counter misinformation, b) social listening tools, and c) trainings for healthcare workers. I will introduce and discuss strength and weaknesses of effective psychological counter measures against vaccination misinformation for mass communication contexts (e.g., debunking, inoculation, rebuttal) and interpersonal communication contexts (e.g., empathetic refutational interviewing). I will highlight how all these interventions can benefit from knowledge about the target groups beliefs and attitude roots-underlying psychological needs that drive belief in vaccination misinformation. Finally, I will present insights from two research projects funded by the European Commission (Jitsuvax) and the German Federal Ministry of Health (InveSt HPV) that focus on training healthcare workers on how to approach vaccination misinformation effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.146
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Behavioural Science for Infodemic Preparedness: The Case of Vaccination Misinformation

Philipp Schmid
European Journal of Public Health
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Using Behavioural Science for Infodemic Preparedness: The Case of Vaccination Misinformation

Philipp Schmid
article en

Abstract

Abstract Worldwide at least 154 million lives were saved due to vaccination in the last five decades alone. However, the spread of vaccination mis- and disinformation remains a threat to the success of vaccinations by increasing vaccine hesitancy, that is, an individual's decision to delay or refuse available, recommended vaccinations. Moreover, changes in the global political climate threaten funding for national and international vaccination programmes and campaigns. The changes are often justified by repeating common misinformation such as the alleged link between measles vaccinations and autism. Given these global challenges and developments, it is questionable whether the global community is better prepared for a future pandemic than before the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this development, the scientific community has gathered knowledge and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic that help to prepare for future outbreaks if implemented. In this presentation I will focus on three key lessons from the COVID-19 era on how to better approach vaccination misinformation and strengthen pandemic preparedness: implementation of a) effective measures to counter misinformation, b) social listening tools, and c) trainings for healthcare workers. I will introduce and discuss strength and weaknesses of effective psychological counter measures against vaccination misinformation for mass communication contexts (e.g., debunking, inoculation, rebuttal) and interpersonal communication contexts (e.g., empathetic refutational interviewing). I will highlight how all these interventions can benefit from knowledge about the target groups beliefs and attitude roots-underlying psychological needs that drive belief in vaccination misinformation. Finally, I will present insights from two research projects funded by the European Commission (Jitsuvax) and the German Federal Ministry of Health (InveSt HPV) that focus on training healthcare workers on how to approach vaccination misinformation effectively.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.