Validation of a tool for measuring person-centred care across settings and professional groups

Abstract Background Person-centred care (PCC) is promoted as a way to improve the health of patients and staff, as well as support staff retention in health and social care. The growing global interest for health systems to adopt the PCC approach rise the need for evaluation of its efficiency. However, there is a lack of instruments to measure PCC among staff across care contexts and professional groups. As part of the ongoing PCC@Work project, an adapted version of the Swedish Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) was validated to support its broader application. Methods This cross-sectional study included baseline data from 2269 health and social care professionals working in hospital, municipal and regional primary care settings in Western Sweden. The P-CAT is a self-report tool containing 13 items rated on a five-point Likert scale. It consists of two subscales: Extent of Personalising Care (EPC) and Organisational and Environmental Support (OES). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to assess construct validity, and Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency reliability. Results The analyses supported a two-factor structure. Factor loadings were acceptable, ranging from 0.40 to 0.78, and the two factors explained 52.2% of the variance (EPC 35.3%; OES 16.9%). The findings showed very good internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84 for the full scale, 0.85 for EPC, and 0.82 for OES. Conclusions The adapted P-CAT demonstrated acceptable construct validity and very good internal consistency reliability. These findings represent an important initial step in validating the adapted Swedish P-CAT. Valid and reliable evaluation instruments facilitate follow-up studies of introduction of PCC and contribute to good quality research on the efficiency of the approach to improve the health and wellbeing of patients and health and retention of staff. Key messages • The analysis showed acceptable construct validity and very good consistency reliability, representing an important initial step in validating the adapted Swedish P-CAT. • The adapted Swedish P-CAT can be used to enhance our understanding of the impact of PCC and contribute to public health by identifying ways to improve health outcomes for both patients and staff.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1454
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a tool for measuring person-centred care across settings and professional groups

Cornelia van Diepen, Qarin Lood, Andreas Fors, K. Gustavsson et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Validation of a tool for measuring person-centred care across settings and professional groups

Cornelia van Diepen, Qarin Lood, Andreas Fors, K. Gustavsson, Gunnel Hensing
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Person-centred care (PCC) is promoted as a way to improve the health of patients and staff, as well as support staff retention in health and social care. The growing global interest for health systems to adopt the PCC approach rise the need for evaluation of its efficiency. However, there is a lack of instruments to measure PCC among staff across care contexts and professional groups. As part of the ongoing PCC@Work project, an adapted version of the Swedish Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) was validated to support its broader application. Methods This cross-sectional study included baseline data from 2269 health and social care professionals working in hospital, municipal and regional primary care settings in Western Sweden. The P-CAT is a self-report tool containing 13 items rated on a five-point Likert scale. It consists of two subscales: Extent of Personalising Care (EPC) and Organisational and Environmental Support (OES). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to assess construct validity, and Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency reliability. Results The analyses supported a two-factor structure. Factor loadings were acceptable, ranging from 0.40 to 0.78, and the two factors explained 52.2% of the variance (EPC 35.3%; OES 16.9%). The findings showed very good internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84 for the full scale, 0.85 for EPC, and 0.82 for OES. Conclusions The adapted P-CAT demonstrated acceptable construct validity and very good internal consistency reliability. These findings represent an important initial step in validating the adapted Swedish P-CAT. Valid and reliable evaluation instruments facilitate follow-up studies of introduction of PCC and contribute to good quality research on the efficiency of the approach to improve the health and wellbeing of patients and health and retention of staff. Key messages • The analysis showed acceptable construct validity and very good consistency reliability, representing an important initial step in validating the adapted Swedish P-CAT. • The adapted Swedish P-CAT can be used to enhance our understanding of the impact of PCC and contribute to public health by identifying ways to improve health outcomes for both patients and staff.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Primary Health Care (QA), University of Gothenburg (SE), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.