Long COVID in Healthcare and Essential Workers: A Mixed-Methods Study from the REACT Cohort

Abstract Background Essential workers, particularly healthcare workers (HCWs) faced significant occupational exposure to COVID-19, making them potentially more vulnerable to long COVID and its impact on job performance. Aim to assess the impact of long COVID among HCWs with and without patient contact compared to other essential workers, using data from the Real-time Assessment of Community Transmission (REACT) study. Methods A mixed-method approach was used, analysing data from 123,463 participants in the English population-based REACT study. Participants were categorized as patient-facing HCWs, non-patient-facing HCWs and Other essential workers. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression (odds ratios [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI 95%]) were applied. Qualitative data from 9 online semi-structured interviews with healthcare-based employees were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Long COVID prevalence was highest among patient-facing HCWs (11%, 95% CI: 10.3-11.7%), followed by non-patient-facing HCWs (9.5%, 95% CI: 8.4-10.7%) and other essential workers (7%, 95% CI: 6.8-7.2%). Female gender, older age, and comorbidities were associated with higher prevalence, with comorbidities being the strongest predictor for poor health. One-third of HCWs reported changes in work hours or duties due to ongoing symptoms, compared to one in five other essential workers. Less than 25% of patient-facing HCWs reported full recovery. Qualitative analysis identified 4 themes: difficulty accessing medical care, transitioning from HCWs to patient, job performance challenges and the significance of long COVID. They reported affected work life and forcing themselves to return to work despite ongoing symptoms. Conclusions Long COVID significantly burdens HCWs and essential workers, especially patient-facing HCWs. Findings highlight the need for tailored occupational health support, improved diagnostics, and workplace adaptations to aid recovery and retention. Key messages • Patient-facing HCWs show the highest long COVID rates, with major impacts on job duties, recovery, and access to care. • Long COVID disrupts HCWs’ work lives, highlighting the need for job adaptations and better occupational health responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1450
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long COVID in Healthcare and Essential Workers: A Mixed-Methods Study from the REACT Cohort

Pia Delano, Heather Ward, Alejandra Vives, Chiara Di Gravio et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

Long COVID in Healthcare and Essential Workers: A Mixed-Methods Study from the REACT Cohort

Pia Delano, Heather Ward, Alejandra Vives, Chiara Di Gravio, Vanessa Guzmán, Mireia Utzet, Fernando G. Benavides, P. Elliot
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Essential workers, particularly healthcare workers (HCWs) faced significant occupational exposure to COVID-19, making them potentially more vulnerable to long COVID and its impact on job performance. Aim to assess the impact of long COVID among HCWs with and without patient contact compared to other essential workers, using data from the Real-time Assessment of Community Transmission (REACT) study. Methods A mixed-method approach was used, analysing data from 123,463 participants in the English population-based REACT study. Participants were categorized as patient-facing HCWs, non-patient-facing HCWs and Other essential workers. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression (odds ratios [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI 95%]) were applied. Qualitative data from 9 online semi-structured interviews with healthcare-based employees were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Long COVID prevalence was highest among patient-facing HCWs (11%, 95% CI: 10.3-11.7%), followed by non-patient-facing HCWs (9.5%, 95% CI: 8.4-10.7%) and other essential workers (7%, 95% CI: 6.8-7.2%). Female gender, older age, and comorbidities were associated with higher prevalence, with comorbidities being the strongest predictor for poor health. One-third of HCWs reported changes in work hours or duties due to ongoing symptoms, compared to one in five other essential workers. Less than 25% of patient-facing HCWs reported full recovery. Qualitative analysis identified 4 themes: difficulty accessing medical care, transitioning from HCWs to patient, job performance challenges and the significance of long COVID. They reported affected work life and forcing themselves to return to work despite ongoing symptoms. Conclusions Long COVID significantly burdens HCWs and essential workers, especially patient-facing HCWs. Findings highlight the need for tailored occupational health support, improved diagnostics, and workplace adaptations to aid recovery and retention. Key messages • Patient-facing HCWs show the highest long COVID rates, with major impacts on job duties, recovery, and access to care. • Long COVID disrupts HCWs’ work lives, highlighting the need for job adaptations and better occupational health responses.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Medical Research Network (US), MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.