Barriers and facilitators to participate in a combined lifestyle intervention – a qualitative study

Abstract Background Combined lifestyle interventions (CLI) have been shown to be effective on metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes, weight reduction, and quality of life improvement. However, dropout rates in these programs are relatively high in the Netherlands, ranging from 40 to 50% of those who start. This study aimed to identify facilitating and inhibiting factors influencing participation in CLI's. Methods Data were collected through individual interviews with 68 participants (including those who had completed the two-year program, those currently participating, and those who had withdrawn before completion), and 5 focus groups consisting of 23 healthcare professionals (e.g. lifestyle coaches, GP's, and occupational physicians). Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Data were coded both inductively and deductively, using the WHO Multidimensional Adherence Model, complemented by the COM-B model for behavior change. Results Barriers and facilitators were identified in all domains of the two frameworks. Barriers included the perception of a lack of commitment to the CLI, poor rapport with the lifestyle coach, a perceived unpleasant group dynamic, lack of physical activity elements in the CLI, conflicting external responsibilities in work or private settings, and little to no perceived outcomes. Facilitators included a source of extrinsic motivation, a sense of acquiring new knowledge, receiving practical advice, a personalized approach, increased interaction with others and the lifestyle coach, and the use of interactive learning formats. Conclusions To promote a successful/improved participation to the CLI, it is recommended to incorporate strategies to overcome these barriers and better use facilitators. For example, detailed information and advice should be provided based on personal needs and interactive elements should be incorporated to provide participants with practical advices. Key messages • Key barriers and facilitators concern (lack of) motivation, practical advice, personalization, and interaction. • Tailoring CLI to individual needs and using interactive formats may reduce dropout.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1241
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and facilitators to participate in a combined lifestyle intervention – a qualitative study

G. Ardine de Wit, Karin I. Proper, Marije Oosterhoff, Sanne Helmig
European Journal of Public Health
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
article

Barriers and facilitators to participate in a combined lifestyle intervention – a qualitative study

G. Ardine de Wit, Karin I. Proper, Marije Oosterhoff, Sanne Helmig
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Combined lifestyle interventions (CLI) have been shown to be effective on metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes, weight reduction, and quality of life improvement. However, dropout rates in these programs are relatively high in the Netherlands, ranging from 40 to 50% of those who start. This study aimed to identify facilitating and inhibiting factors influencing participation in CLI's. Methods Data were collected through individual interviews with 68 participants (including those who had completed the two-year program, those currently participating, and those who had withdrawn before completion), and 5 focus groups consisting of 23 healthcare professionals (e.g. lifestyle coaches, GP's, and occupational physicians). Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Data were coded both inductively and deductively, using the WHO Multidimensional Adherence Model, complemented by the COM-B model for behavior change. Results Barriers and facilitators were identified in all domains of the two frameworks. Barriers included the perception of a lack of commitment to the CLI, poor rapport with the lifestyle coach, a perceived unpleasant group dynamic, lack of physical activity elements in the CLI, conflicting external responsibilities in work or private settings, and little to no perceived outcomes. Facilitators included a source of extrinsic motivation, a sense of acquiring new knowledge, receiving practical advice, a personalized approach, increased interaction with others and the lifestyle coach, and the use of interactive learning formats. Conclusions To promote a successful/improved participation to the CLI, it is recommended to incorporate strategies to overcome these barriers and better use facilitators. For example, detailed information and advice should be provided based on personal needs and interactive elements should be incorporated to provide participants with practical advices. Key messages • Key barriers and facilitators concern (lack of) motivation, practical advice, personalization, and interaction. • Tailoring CLI to individual needs and using interactive formats may reduce dropout.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.