Stakeholders’ power and interests in alcohol, tobacco, and nicotine policy in 7 European countries

Abstract Background The different interests of public sector, civil society, and commercial sector have strong influence on alcohol, tobacco, and nicotine policies. As part of JAPreventNCD project, a stakeholder analysis was conducted in seven European countries to study the interests and influences of the key players in these policies. Methods Organizations in BE, BG, EE, FI, IS, SI, and UA participated in an online stakeholder-analysis survey in November-December 2024. The average power to influence these policies (scale: 0, none to 3, strong) and support for selected policy measures (6-point Likert scale from 1, strongly oppose to 6, strongly support) of the three stakeholder groups were assessed. Differences were analyzed using ANOVA. Results Altogether 34% of the 662 invited stakeholders responded (n = 223): 47% from the public sector, 34% from civil society, and 19% from the commercial sector. In preliminary analyses, the commercial sector had more power to influence alcohol (mean score:1.4±0.7) than tobacco (1.1±0.6) or nicotine (1.0±0.7) policies. Its interest in influencing tobacco (1.1±1.2) and nicotine (1.3±1.2) policies was significantly lower than that of the public sector (for both policies, 2.3±1.0) and civil society (2.0±1.1) (p < 0.001). Among stakeholders, influencing availability measures was the top priority. Both civil society and public sector support measures to reduce the availability or lower the affordability of these products (4.5±0.9 to 5.1±0.7), whereas the commercial sector's views significantly differ (p < 0.001). The commercial sector opposes more strongly especially availability measures for alcohol (2.7±1.0) and nicotine (2.8±1.3). Conclusions While civil society and public sector support measures to reduce the availability of harmful products, the commercial sector opposes to these measures, more strongly for alcohol. Commercial determinants of health have strong impact on the implementation of evidence-based health policies. Key messages • There is an imbalance between different stakeholders in power and interest in influencing health policies. • Policies that put public health ahead of commercial interests are necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.489
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholders’ power and interests in alcohol, tobacco, and nicotine policy in 7 European countries

Sandra Radoš Krnel, Katariina Warpenius, Helena Koprivnikar, Taija Voutilainen et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

Stakeholders’ power and interests in alcohol, tobacco, and nicotine policy in 7 European countries

Sandra Radoš Krnel, Katariina Warpenius, Helena Koprivnikar, Taija Voutilainen, K Marushko, Y Kotykovych
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The different interests of public sector, civil society, and commercial sector have strong influence on alcohol, tobacco, and nicotine policies. As part of JAPreventNCD project, a stakeholder analysis was conducted in seven European countries to study the interests and influences of the key players in these policies. Methods Organizations in BE, BG, EE, FI, IS, SI, and UA participated in an online stakeholder-analysis survey in November-December 2024. The average power to influence these policies (scale: 0, none to 3, strong) and support for selected policy measures (6-point Likert scale from 1, strongly oppose to 6, strongly support) of the three stakeholder groups were assessed. Differences were analyzed using ANOVA. Results Altogether 34% of the 662 invited stakeholders responded (n = 223): 47% from the public sector, 34% from civil society, and 19% from the commercial sector. In preliminary analyses, the commercial sector had more power to influence alcohol (mean score:1.4±0.7) than tobacco (1.1±0.6) or nicotine (1.0±0.7) policies. Its interest in influencing tobacco (1.1±1.2) and nicotine (1.3±1.2) policies was significantly lower than that of the public sector (for both policies, 2.3±1.0) and civil society (2.0±1.1) (p < 0.001). Among stakeholders, influencing availability measures was the top priority. Both civil society and public sector support measures to reduce the availability or lower the affordability of these products (4.5±0.9 to 5.1±0.7), whereas the commercial sector's views significantly differ (p < 0.001). The commercial sector opposes more strongly especially availability measures for alcohol (2.7±1.0) and nicotine (2.8±1.3). Conclusions While civil society and public sector support measures to reduce the availability of harmful products, the commercial sector opposes to these measures, more strongly for alcohol. Commercial determinants of health have strong impact on the implementation of evidence-based health policies. Key messages • There is an imbalance between different stakeholders in power and interest in influencing health policies. • Policies that put public health ahead of commercial interests are necessary.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Social Welfare Department (HK), Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI), Ministry of Health (HU), National Institute of Public Health (SI), Center for Non-Communicable Diseases (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.