Intersectional inequalities in health in Germany: The effects of sex, education, and migration

Abstract Background Persisting health inequalities for females, those with less education, and those with migration background have been documented in Germany and Europe, but few studies have used intersectional methods to assess the combined effect of these identities on self-rated health (SRH). Methods Using baseline data from 191,836 German National Cohort (NAKO) participants, we created three intersectional exposure variables combining binary sex, level of education, and migration variables (any migration, Turkish, and ethnic German resettler backgrounds). We used multinomial logistic regression to produce relative risk (RR) ratios for poor SRH as compared to good SRH while controlling for age, household size, and study site. We assessed additive interaction by computing two- and three-way relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) measures. Results Compared to university-educated non-migrant males, the RR of poor SRH increased as the number of disadvantaged identities increased. Among those without university and with any migration background, males had a RR of 2.27 (95% CI 2.11-2.45) and females a RR of 2.59 (95% CI 2.42-2.77). Inequalities were most extreme for females without university who were Turkish (RR 5.86, 95% CI 4.98-6.89) or resettlers (RR 3.44, 95% CI 2.89-4.10). We found several significant superadditive RERI effects. The total RERI for having any migration background, being female, and not being university educated was 0.65 (95% CI 0.45-0.84), indicating that the interaction of these identities was associated with a 65% increase in risk in addition to the separate risk of each identity. The RERI for Turkish females without university was especially notable, indicating a 369% increase in risk (Total RERI 3.69, 95% CI 2.65-4.72). Conclusions We found intersectional inequalities in SRH by sex, education, and migration. The interaction between disadvantaged identities increased the risk of poor SRH beyond the added risk of each individual identity. Key messages • We found intersectional inequalities in health by sex, education, and migration. The interaction of these identities increased the risk of poor health beyond the separate risk of each identity. • Future research should explore how intersectional inequalities may affect the progression towards worse health over time. Policymakers should be aware of nuanced differences between subgroups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.187
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectional inequalities in health in Germany: The effects of sex, education, and migration

Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Eva Rehfuess, S. Claire Slesinski, Gabriele Bolte et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Health and Medical Studies
article

Intersectional inequalities in health in Germany: The effects of sex, education, and migration

Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Eva Rehfuess, S. Claire Slesinski, Gabriele Bolte, Oliver Razum, Klaus Telkmann, Usama Bilal, Annette Peters, A. Schneider, JP Heisig
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Persisting health inequalities for females, those with less education, and those with migration background have been documented in Germany and Europe, but few studies have used intersectional methods to assess the combined effect of these identities on self-rated health (SRH). Methods Using baseline data from 191,836 German National Cohort (NAKO) participants, we created three intersectional exposure variables combining binary sex, level of education, and migration variables (any migration, Turkish, and ethnic German resettler backgrounds). We used multinomial logistic regression to produce relative risk (RR) ratios for poor SRH as compared to good SRH while controlling for age, household size, and study site. We assessed additive interaction by computing two- and three-way relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) measures. Results Compared to university-educated non-migrant males, the RR of poor SRH increased as the number of disadvantaged identities increased. Among those without university and with any migration background, males had a RR of 2.27 (95% CI 2.11-2.45) and females a RR of 2.59 (95% CI 2.42-2.77). Inequalities were most extreme for females without university who were Turkish (RR 5.86, 95% CI 4.98-6.89) or resettlers (RR 3.44, 95% CI 2.89-4.10). We found several significant superadditive RERI effects. The total RERI for having any migration background, being female, and not being university educated was 0.65 (95% CI 0.45-0.84), indicating that the interaction of these identities was associated with a 65% increase in risk in addition to the separate risk of each identity. The RERI for Turkish females without university was especially notable, indicating a 369% increase in risk (Total RERI 3.69, 95% CI 2.65-4.72). Conclusions We found intersectional inequalities in SRH by sex, education, and migration. The interaction between disadvantaged identities increased the risk of poor SRH beyond the added risk of each individual identity. Key messages • We found intersectional inequalities in health by sex, education, and migration. The interaction of these identities increased the risk of poor health beyond the separate risk of each identity. • Future research should explore how intersectional inequalities may affect the progression towards worse health over time. Policymakers should be aware of nuanced differences between subgroups.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
University of Bremen (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), WZB Berlin Social Science Center (DE), Helmholtz Zentrum München (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Drexel University (US), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Health and Medical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.