Non-alcoholic beverage demand across income groups and effects on sugary beverage taxation in Germany

Abstract Background Due to their high sugar content, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) have been identified as an important contributor to the global epidemic of obesity which poses a large health and economic burden on individuals and social care systems. To reduce their intake, several countries have implemented taxes on SSBs. In Germany, the potential effects of SSB taxation on SSB purchasing across household income categories are unknown. Methods We used two waves of a nationally representative household consumption survey (2013 and 2018) to estimate the demand for six non-alcoholic beverage categories (flavored milk, plain milk, water, SSBs, juice, coffee & tea) in Germany across household income strata using an economic Almost Ideal Demand System. We estimated own- and cross-price elasticities that enable the prediction of changes in beverage consumption based on changes in beverage prices. Using these estimates, we simulated how beverage consumption would change under two scenarios: (1) 20% value added tax on SSBs, and (2) 20% value added tax on SSBs, fruit juice, and flavored milk. Results We find that the demand for SSBs, fruit juice, and flavored milk is sensitive to price changes, particularly among low- and middle-income households (p-values of own-price effects <0.001). A 20% added value tax on SSBs would reduce the average monthly amount purchased per household by around 3.4 liters. High-income households would only reduce their SSB purchases by 1.5 liters, while those with a low or middle income would reduce purchases by 4.0 and 4.8 liters, respectively. Including fruit juice and flavored milk in the tax would only lead to small additional effects. The financial burden of taxation was consistently twice as large for low- versus high-income households. Conclusions SSB taxation in Germany would be financially regressive but could help reducing health inequalities as sugar reductions are concentrated among low- and middle-income households. Key messages • German consumers across income strata are sensitive to changes in prices of unhealthy sugary beverages. • Taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages would particularly lead to fewer purchases among low- and middle income households, which could lead to a reduction of health inequalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1052
Primary Topic
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-alcoholic beverage demand across income groups and effects on sugary beverage taxation in Germany

Michael Laxy, Jutta Roosen, Karl Emmert-Fees, Matthias Staudigel
European Journal of Public Health
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
article

Non-alcoholic beverage demand across income groups and effects on sugary beverage taxation in Germany

Michael Laxy, Jutta Roosen, Karl Emmert-Fees, Matthias Staudigel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Due to their high sugar content, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) have been identified as an important contributor to the global epidemic of obesity which poses a large health and economic burden on individuals and social care systems. To reduce their intake, several countries have implemented taxes on SSBs. In Germany, the potential effects of SSB taxation on SSB purchasing across household income categories are unknown. Methods We used two waves of a nationally representative household consumption survey (2013 and 2018) to estimate the demand for six non-alcoholic beverage categories (flavored milk, plain milk, water, SSBs, juice, coffee & tea) in Germany across household income strata using an economic Almost Ideal Demand System. We estimated own- and cross-price elasticities that enable the prediction of changes in beverage consumption based on changes in beverage prices. Using these estimates, we simulated how beverage consumption would change under two scenarios: (1) 20% value added tax on SSBs, and (2) 20% value added tax on SSBs, fruit juice, and flavored milk. Results We find that the demand for SSBs, fruit juice, and flavored milk is sensitive to price changes, particularly among low- and middle-income households (p-values of own-price effects <0.001). A 20% added value tax on SSBs would reduce the average monthly amount purchased per household by around 3.4 liters. High-income households would only reduce their SSB purchases by 1.5 liters, while those with a low or middle income would reduce purchases by 4.0 and 4.8 liters, respectively. Including fruit juice and flavored milk in the tax would only lead to small additional effects. The financial burden of taxation was consistently twice as large for low- versus high-income households. Conclusions SSB taxation in Germany would be financially regressive but could help reducing health inequalities as sugar reductions are concentrated among low- and middle-income households. Key messages • German consumers across income strata are sensitive to changes in prices of unhealthy sugary beverages. • Taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages would particularly lead to fewer purchases among low- and middle income households, which could lead to a reduction of health inequalities.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.