The combined impact of fisheries and climate change on future carbon sequestration by oceanic macrofauna

Although the role of marine macrofauna in the ocean carbon cycle is increasingly understood, the cumulative impacts of fisheries and climate change on this pathway remain overlooked. Here, using a marine ecosystem model, we estimate that each degree of warming reduces macrofauna biomass and carbon export by 4.2% and 2.46%, respectively. Under a high emission scenario (SSP 5-8.5), this translates to a 13.5% ± 6.6% decline in export by 2100, relative to the 1990s. Fishing further amplifies this reduction by up to 56.7% ± 16.3%, creating a sequestration deficit of 14.6 ± 10.3 GtC by 2100. On average, a 1% biomass loss from fishing results in a 0.8% decline in carbon export. However, sequestration durability (~600 years) remains unaffected. While measures restoring commercial macrofaunal biomass could yield carbon benefits comparable to mangrove restoration, multiple uncertainties limit their inclusion in the Nature-based Climate Solution portfolio, highlighting the need for further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64576-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The combined impact of fisheries and climate change on future carbon sequestration by oceanic macrofauna

Nicolas Barrier, Daniele Bianchi, David Mouillot, Jérôme Guiet et al.
1 citations
Nature Communications
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.36
article

The combined impact of fisheries and climate change on future carbon sequestration by oceanic macrofauna

Nicolas Barrier, Daniele Bianchi, David Mouillot, Jérôme Guiet, Marc Troussellier, Tim DeVries, Gaël Mariani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although the role of marine macrofauna in the ocean carbon cycle is increasingly understood, the cumulative impacts of fisheries and climate change on this pathway remain overlooked. Here, using a marine ecosystem model, we estimate that each degree of warming reduces macrofauna biomass and carbon export by 4.2% and 2.46%, respectively. Under a high emission scenario (SSP 5-8.5), this translates to a 13.5% ± 6.6% decline in export by 2100, relative to the 1990s. Fishing further amplifies this reduction by up to 56.7% ± 16.3%, creating a sequestration deficit of 14.6 ± 10.3 GtC by 2100. On average, a 1% biomass loss from fishing results in a 0.8% decline in carbon export. However, sequestration durability (~600 years) remains unaffected. While measures restoring commercial macrofaunal biomass could yield carbon benefits comparable to mangrove restoration, multiple uncertainties limit their inclusion in the Nature-based Climate Solution portfolio, highlighting the need for further research.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), World Maritime University (SE), Ifremer (FR), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Université de Montpellier (FR), Marine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, European Commission, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Université de Montpellier, Research Executive Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.