Health and social benefits of workplace health promotion in the German Federal Armed Forces

Abstract Background Since 2015, workplace health promotion measures (WHPM) are implemented in the German Federal Armed Forces (GFAF). Here the aim was to evaluate associations between participation in WHPM and self-rated health, quality of life, social as well as health risk factors and days of incapacity to work (DIW) for main diseases reported. Methods A longitudinal observational study (T0: 06-09/2022; T1: 06-09/2023; T2: 06-09/2024) was conducted. Each survey invitation was addressed to about 220.000 employees of the GFAF. Employees who participated in at least two out of the three surveys were included in a longitudinal analysis. The odds were adjusted for relevant baseline characteristics in logistic regression models. Results In T0 23.568 (10.5%), T1 14.059 (6%), T2 13.551 (6%) employees participated. N = 7.183 participated in at least two surveys (military: 49%; women (w): 35.1%; mean age 43.42 ± SD 10.37 years). The chance to rate their general health status as good/very good was 20% higher for employees participating in WHPM [OR 1.20; 95%; CI [1.05, 1.37]) as well as the chance to rate their quality of life as very good/good [OR 1.48; 95%; CI [1.29, 1.69]. For employees participating in WHPM the chance was 12% lower to have high blood pressure (OR 0.88; 95% CI [0.75, 1.05]). No relevant difference was found regarding the ability to work (OR 1.05; 95% CI [0.92, 1.19]). Women participating showed a 13% lower chance to rate their job satisfaction as positive than men (OR 0.87; 95%; CI [0.71, 1.07]). There was a relative decrease of DIW for musculoskeletal diseases for employees participating (-2.6%; no WHPM: +28.9%). DIW for mental health issues showed the same trend (-14.9%; no WHPM: +7.5%). Conclusions Associations can be seen between WHPM and self-rated health, quality of life, health risk factors and DIW. Nevertheless, the study design is associated with limitations arising from the observational design, future studies should take randomized approaches into account. Key messages • There are associations between workplace health promotion measures and self-rated health, quality of life, health risk factors and days of incapacity to work. • There are sex/gender differences regarding job satisfaction. Future studies should take randomized approaches into account.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.413
Primary Topic
School Health and Nursing Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health and social benefits of workplace health promotion in the German Federal Armed Forces

Luke Arnold, Thomas Reinhold, Sabine Ludwig, Ute Seeland et al.
European Journal of Public Health
School Health and Nursing Education
article

Health and social benefits of workplace health promotion in the German Federal Armed Forces

Luke Arnold, Thomas Reinhold, Sabine Ludwig, Ute Seeland, S N Willich, Robert Röhle, C Dickob, J Ucar, Rabindra N. Roy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Since 2015, workplace health promotion measures (WHPM) are implemented in the German Federal Armed Forces (GFAF). Here the aim was to evaluate associations between participation in WHPM and self-rated health, quality of life, social as well as health risk factors and days of incapacity to work (DIW) for main diseases reported. Methods A longitudinal observational study (T0: 06-09/2022; T1: 06-09/2023; T2: 06-09/2024) was conducted. Each survey invitation was addressed to about 220.000 employees of the GFAF. Employees who participated in at least two out of the three surveys were included in a longitudinal analysis. The odds were adjusted for relevant baseline characteristics in logistic regression models. Results In T0 23.568 (10.5%), T1 14.059 (6%), T2 13.551 (6%) employees participated. N = 7.183 participated in at least two surveys (military: 49%; women (w): 35.1%; mean age 43.42 ± SD 10.37 years). The chance to rate their general health status as good/very good was 20% higher for employees participating in WHPM [OR 1.20; 95%; CI [1.05, 1.37]) as well as the chance to rate their quality of life as very good/good [OR 1.48; 95%; CI [1.29, 1.69]. For employees participating in WHPM the chance was 12% lower to have high blood pressure (OR 0.88; 95% CI [0.75, 1.05]). No relevant difference was found regarding the ability to work (OR 1.05; 95% CI [0.92, 1.19]). Women participating showed a 13% lower chance to rate their job satisfaction as positive than men (OR 0.87; 95%; CI [0.71, 1.07]). There was a relative decrease of DIW for musculoskeletal diseases for employees participating (-2.6%; no WHPM: +28.9%). DIW for mental health issues showed the same trend (-14.9%; no WHPM: +7.5%). Conclusions Associations can be seen between WHPM and self-rated health, quality of life, health risk factors and DIW. Nevertheless, the study design is associated with limitations arising from the observational design, future studies should take randomized approaches into account. Key messages • There are associations between workplace health promotion measures and self-rated health, quality of life, health risk factors and days of incapacity to work. • There are sex/gender differences regarding job satisfaction. Future studies should take randomized approaches into account.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Bundeswehr Joint Medical Service (DE), Zimmer Biomet (Germany) (DE), Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Bundeswehr Medical Service Academy (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
School Health and Nursing Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.