Public opinions on societal measures to prevent obesity – a population-based study from Finland

Abstract Background Modifying obesogenic environment to be more health-promoting is crucial in preventing obesity. Effective societal measures e.g. health-related taxes, improved nutritional labelling, and restricting the marketing of unhealthy foods were examined in terms of public support. Methods Data (n = 4,543) consisted of participants aged 20+ years from the nationally representative Healthy Finland Survey conducted in 2023. Participants were asked “In your opinion, what should society do to prevent obesity from becoming more common in Finland?” and could select multiple options from a predefined list of 12 measures. Population-weighted prevalence of support for each measure was analyzed using logistic regression. Results The most widely supported measures were limiting marketing of unhealthy foods (53% of women, 51% of men), improving the quality of food served in food services even at higher cost (56% of women, 51% of men), and encouraging the food industry to reformulate products into healthier versions (49% of men and women). In contrast, the least supported measure was limiting the availability of fast food, e.g. by regulating the number or opening hours of restaurants (7% of women, 9% of men). Overall, the opinions were similar between sexes. However, women more often supported making participation in weight management groups easier compared to men (45%, 95%CI 42-47, vs. 29%, 95%CI 26-31), as well as reducing the package sizes of unhealthy foods (39%, 95%CI 37-41, vs. 24%, 95%CI 22-26). Support for sugar taxation (38% of women, 42% of men) was notably higher than for fat taxation (27% of women, 26% of men). Conclusions Public support for obesity prevention was strongest for measures that limit individual autonomy less, such as limiting harmful marketing and improving quality of foods and food services. Restrictive measures like regulation of food availability and taxation received comparatively less support, although sugar taxation received fairly strong support. Key messages • The most widely supported societal measures for obesity prevention were those regarding limiting harmful marketing and improving quality of foods and food services. • Men and women had rather similar opinions on obesity prevention measures. Next, we will examine differences in these opinions between population groups based on e.g. age and education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.410
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public opinions on societal measures to prevent obesity – a population-based study from Finland

Satu Männistö, Tarja Palosaari, Laura Sares‐Jäske, Päivi Mäki et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Obesity and Health Practices
2.02
article

Public opinions on societal measures to prevent obesity – a population-based study from Finland

Satu Männistö, Tarja Palosaari, Laura Sares‐Jäske, Päivi Mäki, Katri Sääksjärvi, T Kaunonen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Modifying obesogenic environment to be more health-promoting is crucial in preventing obesity. Effective societal measures e.g. health-related taxes, improved nutritional labelling, and restricting the marketing of unhealthy foods were examined in terms of public support. Methods Data (n = 4,543) consisted of participants aged 20+ years from the nationally representative Healthy Finland Survey conducted in 2023. Participants were asked “In your opinion, what should society do to prevent obesity from becoming more common in Finland?” and could select multiple options from a predefined list of 12 measures. Population-weighted prevalence of support for each measure was analyzed using logistic regression. Results The most widely supported measures were limiting marketing of unhealthy foods (53% of women, 51% of men), improving the quality of food served in food services even at higher cost (56% of women, 51% of men), and encouraging the food industry to reformulate products into healthier versions (49% of men and women). In contrast, the least supported measure was limiting the availability of fast food, e.g. by regulating the number or opening hours of restaurants (7% of women, 9% of men). Overall, the opinions were similar between sexes. However, women more often supported making participation in weight management groups easier compared to men (45%, 95%CI 42-47, vs. 29%, 95%CI 26-31), as well as reducing the package sizes of unhealthy foods (39%, 95%CI 37-41, vs. 24%, 95%CI 22-26). Support for sugar taxation (38% of women, 42% of men) was notably higher than for fat taxation (27% of women, 26% of men). Conclusions Public support for obesity prevention was strongest for measures that limit individual autonomy less, such as limiting harmful marketing and improving quality of foods and food services. Restrictive measures like regulation of food availability and taxation received comparatively less support, although sugar taxation received fairly strong support. Key messages • The most widely supported societal measures for obesity prevention were those regarding limiting harmful marketing and improving quality of foods and food services. • Men and women had rather similar opinions on obesity prevention measures. Next, we will examine differences in these opinions between population groups based on e.g. age and education.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
University of Turku (FI), Turku University of Applied Sciences (FI), Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI), Public Health Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Obesity and Health Practices
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.