A new intervention for sick-listed employees with mental disorders: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Mental disorders (MDs) can impair individuals’ ability to work, often leading to long-term sickness absence. Evaluations of clinical and work-directed interventions to enhance sustainable return to work (RTW) remain scarce. We investigated the effect of an intensified RTW aftercare intervention (RTW-PIA; DRKS00026232) on achieving sustainable RTW (SRTW) in German employees diagnosed with a MD. Methods A multicenter RCT was conducted in five German psychiatric outpatient clinics involving 484 employees, aged 20-60, mostly diagnosed with recurrent depression. Of these, 240 received RTW-PIA + Care as Usual (CAU) and 244 received CAU only. SRTW was achieved by self-reporting < 6 weeks of workdays missed due to sickness absence within 12 months after full RTW. Data on SRTW and secondary outcomes (health-related quality of life, mental functioning, RTW self-efficacy, overall job satisfaction, severity of mental illness, work ability) were collected at baseline and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. The intervention's effects in the intention-to-treat population were analyzed using logistic regression and growth curve models. Results RTW-PIA did not significantly enhance SRTW in employees (OR = 1.33, 95%CI [0.85-2.07], p=.211), but significantly improved mental functioning over 24 months (ß=0.21, 95%CI [0.03-0.39], p=.023), compared to CAU. The achievement of SRTW was moderated by health insurance (p=.039) and recognized disability degree (p=.026). RTW-PIA was only effective in employees without a disability degree (OR = 1.69, p=.032). Conclusions RTW-PIA, a clinical and work-directed intervention, did not enhance SRTW in employees with a diagnosed MD compared to CAU but improved mental functioning, essential for long-term work participation. The moderation effect implies that RTW-PIA is not yet properly tailored to those with a disability degree. A process evaluation is needed to understand whether content and/or implementation of RTW-PIA needs to be improved. Key messages • An intensified RTW aftercare intervention is effective in the sub-group of employees without a recognized disability degree. • Understanding how the intervention can be better tailored to specific sub-groups is necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.551
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new intervention for sick-listed employees with mental disorders: A randomized controlled trial

Angelique de Rijk, Johannes Zimmermann, Harry T. Inge, Uta Wegewitz et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

A new intervention for sick-listed employees with mental disorders: A randomized controlled trial

Angelique de Rijk, Johannes Zimmermann, Harry T. Inge, Uta Wegewitz, Fiona Starke, Anna Sikora, Ava Schulz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Mental disorders (MDs) can impair individuals’ ability to work, often leading to long-term sickness absence. Evaluations of clinical and work-directed interventions to enhance sustainable return to work (RTW) remain scarce. We investigated the effect of an intensified RTW aftercare intervention (RTW-PIA; DRKS00026232) on achieving sustainable RTW (SRTW) in German employees diagnosed with a MD. Methods A multicenter RCT was conducted in five German psychiatric outpatient clinics involving 484 employees, aged 20-60, mostly diagnosed with recurrent depression. Of these, 240 received RTW-PIA + Care as Usual (CAU) and 244 received CAU only. SRTW was achieved by self-reporting < 6 weeks of workdays missed due to sickness absence within 12 months after full RTW. Data on SRTW and secondary outcomes (health-related quality of life, mental functioning, RTW self-efficacy, overall job satisfaction, severity of mental illness, work ability) were collected at baseline and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. The intervention's effects in the intention-to-treat population were analyzed using logistic regression and growth curve models. Results RTW-PIA did not significantly enhance SRTW in employees (OR = 1.33, 95%CI [0.85-2.07], p=.211), but significantly improved mental functioning over 24 months (ß=0.21, 95%CI [0.03-0.39], p=.023), compared to CAU. The achievement of SRTW was moderated by health insurance (p=.039) and recognized disability degree (p=.026). RTW-PIA was only effective in employees without a disability degree (OR = 1.69, p=.032). Conclusions RTW-PIA, a clinical and work-directed intervention, did not enhance SRTW in employees with a diagnosed MD compared to CAU but improved mental functioning, essential for long-term work participation. The moderation effect implies that RTW-PIA is not yet properly tailored to those with a disability degree. A process evaluation is needed to understand whether content and/or implementation of RTW-PIA needs to be improved. Key messages • An intensified RTW aftercare intervention is effective in the sub-group of employees without a recognized disability degree. • Understanding how the intervention can be better tailored to specific sub-groups is necessary.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
University of Kassel (DE), Maastricht University (NL), Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.