Strengthening Institutional Awareness of Commercial Influence in the Netherlands

Abstract Background Commercial entities are diverse and can contribute both positively and negatively to health. Increasingly, the public health challenges we're facing today are recognised as complex and systemic societal problems that commercial entities play a part in. As a National Public Health Institute (NPHI) and as trusted advisors, we need expertise on this important system of drivers. Failing to account for the impact of these commercial determinants of health (CDoH) may result in incomplete public health models and suboptimal advice. Moreover, the tactics employed by industries influence us as public health actors, requiring our awareness. Our objective is to better understand how commercial (f)actors influence our work and to systematically apply this knowledge to improve and safeguard the accuracy, robustness and impact of our work, now and in the future. Methods We studied the literature in relation to complex systems and industry tactics. In an institute-wide workshop we asked colleagues for CDoH-related examples and discussed potential (counter)actions. Deeper analyses addressed three cases (tobacco/nicotine products; pharmaceuticals; conceptual public health models). In a symposium we will discuss findings, knowledge gaps and strategic priorities with a broad set of researchers and policy makers. Outcomes will be collected in a scientific paper. Results Institute employees provided input from various fields, such as tobacco, pharmaceuticals, foresight methodology, medical technology, fall prevention, food and nutrition, pesticides, vaccine uptake, and pandemic preparedness. One example documented limitations in research methodology applied by tobacco industry, implying that publications should (at least) clearly state industry affiliations. Conclusions These actions aim to solidify our knowledge and advice, counter mis- and disinformation and eventually enable us to contribute to agenda-setting, for improved future research and advice to policy-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.375
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strengthening Institutional Awareness of Commercial Influence in the Netherlands

Mariken Tijhuis, C. Pauwels, Guus Luijben, Reinskje Talhout
European Journal of Public Health
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Strengthening Institutional Awareness of Commercial Influence in the Netherlands

Mariken Tijhuis, C. Pauwels, Guus Luijben, Reinskje Talhout
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Commercial entities are diverse and can contribute both positively and negatively to health. Increasingly, the public health challenges we're facing today are recognised as complex and systemic societal problems that commercial entities play a part in. As a National Public Health Institute (NPHI) and as trusted advisors, we need expertise on this important system of drivers. Failing to account for the impact of these commercial determinants of health (CDoH) may result in incomplete public health models and suboptimal advice. Moreover, the tactics employed by industries influence us as public health actors, requiring our awareness. Our objective is to better understand how commercial (f)actors influence our work and to systematically apply this knowledge to improve and safeguard the accuracy, robustness and impact of our work, now and in the future. Methods We studied the literature in relation to complex systems and industry tactics. In an institute-wide workshop we asked colleagues for CDoH-related examples and discussed potential (counter)actions. Deeper analyses addressed three cases (tobacco/nicotine products; pharmaceuticals; conceptual public health models). In a symposium we will discuss findings, knowledge gaps and strategic priorities with a broad set of researchers and policy makers. Outcomes will be collected in a scientific paper. Results Institute employees provided input from various fields, such as tobacco, pharmaceuticals, foresight methodology, medical technology, fall prevention, food and nutrition, pesticides, vaccine uptake, and pandemic preparedness. One example documented limitations in research methodology applied by tobacco industry, implying that publications should (at least) clearly state industry affiliations. Conclusions These actions aim to solidify our knowledge and advice, counter mis- and disinformation and eventually enable us to contribute to agenda-setting, for improved future research and advice to policy-making.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strengthening Institutional Awareness of Commercial Influence in the Netherlands — Mariken Tijhuis, C. Pauwels, et al. · European Journal of Public Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS