Continuity of Care in Adult Asthma Patients in Izmir: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Tertiary Clinic

Abstract Background Continuity of care is a fundamental component of asthma care. However, it remains understudied in Turkiye. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of continuity of care among adult asthma patients and to identify associated factors. Methods A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was adopted, situated within a critical realist paradigm and conceptually guided by Levesque's healthcare access framework. The first phase included a cross-sectional survey with 312 participants. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted. In the second phase, maximum variation sampling was employed. A total of 12 in-depth interviews were analysed using a critical grounded theory approach. Data saturation was reached after the eighth interview. Results Only 29.2% of participants met the criteria for continuity of care, defined by both relational and management continuity. Patients with well-controlled asthma had significantly higher odds of continuity (OR = 2.67, p = 0.007). Additional factors positively associated with continuity included receiving clear explanations (OR = 3.18, p = 0.003), absence of asthmatic first-degree relatives (OR = 1.92, p = 0.027), less appointment availability (OR = 1.86, p = 0.029), and prescription continuity (OR = 0.14, p < 0.001). Qualitative data revealed key barriers to continuity, including difficulties securing follow-up appointments, particularly with the same physician, which participants valued for patient-centred care within time-limited visits. Communication problems with healthcare providers, treatment burden, and lack of care coordination for comorbidities were reported. Participants also described experiencing stigma in various domains of life. Conclusions Continuity of care remains suboptimal among asthma patients in tertiary settings due to structural and relational barriers. Policy efforts should prioritise integration across levels of care, promote continuity in patient - provider relationships, and address determinants of access. Key messages • Continuity of care among adult asthma patients in this study is low, with only 29.2% experiencing both relational and management continuity, highlighting a critical gap in chronic care delivery. • Structural barriers, communication and coordination issues result in disrupted continuity; integrating services and fostering long-term care relationships are needed for improved asthma care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1558
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuity of Care in Adult Asthma Patients in Izmir: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Tertiary Clinic

Gülistan Karadeniz, Meltem Çiçeklioğlu, İrem Şevik
European Journal of Public Health
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Continuity of Care in Adult Asthma Patients in Izmir: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Tertiary Clinic

Gülistan Karadeniz, Meltem Çiçeklioğlu, İrem Şevik
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Continuity of care is a fundamental component of asthma care. However, it remains understudied in Turkiye. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of continuity of care among adult asthma patients and to identify associated factors. Methods A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was adopted, situated within a critical realist paradigm and conceptually guided by Levesque's healthcare access framework. The first phase included a cross-sectional survey with 312 participants. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted. In the second phase, maximum variation sampling was employed. A total of 12 in-depth interviews were analysed using a critical grounded theory approach. Data saturation was reached after the eighth interview. Results Only 29.2% of participants met the criteria for continuity of care, defined by both relational and management continuity. Patients with well-controlled asthma had significantly higher odds of continuity (OR = 2.67, p = 0.007). Additional factors positively associated with continuity included receiving clear explanations (OR = 3.18, p = 0.003), absence of asthmatic first-degree relatives (OR = 1.92, p = 0.027), less appointment availability (OR = 1.86, p = 0.029), and prescription continuity (OR = 0.14, p < 0.001). Qualitative data revealed key barriers to continuity, including difficulties securing follow-up appointments, particularly with the same physician, which participants valued for patient-centred care within time-limited visits. Communication problems with healthcare providers, treatment burden, and lack of care coordination for comorbidities were reported. Participants also described experiencing stigma in various domains of life. Conclusions Continuity of care remains suboptimal among asthma patients in tertiary settings due to structural and relational barriers. Policy efforts should prioritise integration across levels of care, promote continuity in patient - provider relationships, and address determinants of access. Key messages • Continuity of care among adult asthma patients in this study is low, with only 29.2% experiencing both relational and management continuity, highlighting a critical gap in chronic care delivery. • Structural barriers, communication and coordination issues result in disrupted continuity; integrating services and fostering long-term care relationships are needed for improved asthma care.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Izmir University (TR), Ege University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), HSU Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.