Social and Institutional Trust in the Bulgarian Health System

Abstract Background Trust builds the complex network of relationships in the healthcare system and supports the foundation of its effective functioning. The importance of trust has become more evident, especially during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study is to examine trust in the Bulgarian health system in two dimensions: social and institutional trust, which are distinct yet interconnected. Methods Social trust in healthcare providers was examined in 2023 through a cross-sectional, nationwide survey involving 1,292 respondents. Data were collected via a standardized online questionnaire. Trust was assessed using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not trusted) to 5 (trusted very much). Institutional trust was analyzed using data from Eurofound surveys 2020-2024. Respondents rated their trust in the healthcare system on a scale from 1 (lack of trust) to 10 (full trust). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed to interpret the results. Results Findings regarding social trust reveal that 82.3% of respondents expressed high levels of trust in specialist physicians, 74.9% in general practitioners (GPs), and 50.7% in hospitals. The highest mean trust score was recorded for specialists (4.11), followed by GPs (3.92) and hospitals (3.31). Trust in the provider was a statistically significant predictor of GP visits and hospitalizations, with individuals who had higher levels of trust more likely to access these services than those with lower trust. Population-level trust in the healthcare system ranged between 4.1 and 4.4, with a positive trend observed from 2021 to 2024. Conclusions Future research should focus on identifying the key determinants of trust and on strategies for fostering and maintaining trust within broader health system policies. Sustained efforts to build and preserve trust are essential to ensure equitable access to healthcare and to enhance the overall effectiveness and resilience of the health system. Key messages • Measuring the different dimensions of trust is a crucial first step toward building and sustaining the complex network of relationships that underpin an effective healthcare system. • The study underscores the need for targeted strategies to strengthen trust in healthcare providers and institutions, fostering a more effective, resilient, and equitable health system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1559
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social and Institutional Trust in the Bulgarian Health System

Елка Атанасова, Svetlana Panayotova
European Journal of Public Health
Ethics in medical practice
article

Social and Institutional Trust in the Bulgarian Health System

Елка Атанасова, Svetlana Panayotova
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Trust builds the complex network of relationships in the healthcare system and supports the foundation of its effective functioning. The importance of trust has become more evident, especially during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study is to examine trust in the Bulgarian health system in two dimensions: social and institutional trust, which are distinct yet interconnected. Methods Social trust in healthcare providers was examined in 2023 through a cross-sectional, nationwide survey involving 1,292 respondents. Data were collected via a standardized online questionnaire. Trust was assessed using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not trusted) to 5 (trusted very much). Institutional trust was analyzed using data from Eurofound surveys 2020-2024. Respondents rated their trust in the healthcare system on a scale from 1 (lack of trust) to 10 (full trust). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed to interpret the results. Results Findings regarding social trust reveal that 82.3% of respondents expressed high levels of trust in specialist physicians, 74.9% in general practitioners (GPs), and 50.7% in hospitals. The highest mean trust score was recorded for specialists (4.11), followed by GPs (3.92) and hospitals (3.31). Trust in the provider was a statistically significant predictor of GP visits and hospitalizations, with individuals who had higher levels of trust more likely to access these services than those with lower trust. Population-level trust in the healthcare system ranged between 4.1 and 4.4, with a positive trend observed from 2021 to 2024. Conclusions Future research should focus on identifying the key determinants of trust and on strategies for fostering and maintaining trust within broader health system policies. Sustained efforts to build and preserve trust are essential to ensure equitable access to healthcare and to enhance the overall effectiveness and resilience of the health system. Key messages • Measuring the different dimensions of trust is a crucial first step toward building and sustaining the complex network of relationships that underpin an effective healthcare system. • The study underscores the need for targeted strategies to strengthen trust in healthcare providers and institutions, fostering a more effective, resilient, and equitable health system.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Medical University of Varna (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.