Can information framing increase farmers' uptake of Eco-schemes? a randomised controlled trial

Abstract The overall success of voluntary agri-environmental programmes often hinges importantly on the level of farmer participation. Their enrolment decisions are shaped by a complex set of behavioural factors, which can be targeted by designing specific behavioural interventions—such as nudges—that aim to improve farmers’ uptake of these schemes. However, the effectiveness of these approaches in real-world settings remains understudied. Here, we use two subsequent randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of information treatments on farmers’ enrolment rates and enrolled area in a new Eco-scheme for establishing Skylark plots, which has been implemented as part of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy in Slovenia. The first trial framed enrolment as an environmental gain or loss, while the second trial framed enrolment as a negative or positive descriptive norm. In both trials, interventions had no direct effect on enrolment rates nor on the area enrolled. However, for large farms and for farms with prior enrolment in agri-environmental measures, interventions influenced the enrolment decision and the area enrolled. Our results imply that the provision of untargeted information framing alone may be insufficient to boost enrolment of all farmers in agri-environmental measures. However, such interventions may affect the behaviour of some groups of farmers. To improve enrolment, we recommend better targeting of behavioural interventions, coupled with system-level changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Food Economics
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-025-00417-y
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can information framing increase farmers' uptake of Eco-schemes? a randomised controlled trial

Tanja Šumrada, Carl Johan Lagerkvist, Živa Alif, Ana Novak
Agricultural and Food Economics
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Can information framing increase farmers' uptake of Eco-schemes? a randomised controlled trial

Tanja Šumrada, Carl Johan Lagerkvist, Živa Alif, Ana Novak
article en

Abstract

Abstract The overall success of voluntary agri-environmental programmes often hinges importantly on the level of farmer participation. Their enrolment decisions are shaped by a complex set of behavioural factors, which can be targeted by designing specific behavioural interventions—such as nudges—that aim to improve farmers’ uptake of these schemes. However, the effectiveness of these approaches in real-world settings remains understudied. Here, we use two subsequent randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of information treatments on farmers’ enrolment rates and enrolled area in a new Eco-scheme for establishing Skylark plots, which has been implemented as part of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy in Slovenia. The first trial framed enrolment as an environmental gain or loss, while the second trial framed enrolment as a negative or positive descriptive norm. In both trials, interventions had no direct effect on enrolment rates nor on the area enrolled. However, for large farms and for farms with prior enrolment in agri-environmental measures, interventions influenced the enrolment decision and the area enrolled. Our results imply that the provision of untargeted information framing alone may be insufficient to boost enrolment of all farmers in agri-environmental measures. However, such interventions may affect the behaviour of some groups of farmers. To improve enrolment, we recommend better targeting of behavioural interventions, coupled with system-level changes.

Agricultural and Food EconomicsVol. 13(1)
University of Ljubljana (SI), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.