Human-in-the-loop: Towards label embeddings for assessing classification difficulty

Uncertainty in machine learning models is a timely and vast field of research. In supervised learning, uncertainty can already occur in the first stage of the training process, the annotation phase. This scenario is particularly evident when some instances cannot be definitively classified. In other words, there is inevitable ambiguity in the annotation step and hence, not necessarily a single ‘ground truth’ associated with each instance. This work approaches the problem from a statistical modelling perspective. The main idea is to drop the assumption of a ground truth label and instead embed the annotations into a multidimensional space. This embedding is derived from the empirical distribution of annotations within a Bayesian setup, modelled using a Dirichlet-Multinomial framework. We estimate the model parameters and posteriors using a stochastic Expectation Maximizsation algorithm with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) steps. The methods developed in this article readily extend to various situations in which multiple annotators independently label instances. To showcase the generality of the proposed approach, we apply our approach to three benchmark datasets for image classification and natural language inference (NLI), in which multiple annotations per instance are available. Besides the embeddings, we can investigate the resulting correlation matrices, which reflect the semantic similarities of the original classes for all three exemplary datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistical Modelling
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082x251371796
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human-in-the-loop: Towards label embeddings for assessing classification difficulty

Christoph Koller, Katharina Hechinger, Xiao Xiang Zhu, Göran Kauermann
Statistical Modelling
Machine Learning and Data Classification
article

Human-in-the-loop: Towards label embeddings for assessing classification difficulty

Christoph Koller, Katharina Hechinger, Xiao Xiang Zhu, Göran Kauermann
article en

Abstract

Uncertainty in machine learning models is a timely and vast field of research. In supervised learning, uncertainty can already occur in the first stage of the training process, the annotation phase. This scenario is particularly evident when some instances cannot be definitively classified. In other words, there is inevitable ambiguity in the annotation step and hence, not necessarily a single ‘ground truth’ associated with each instance. This work approaches the problem from a statistical modelling perspective. The main idea is to drop the assumption of a ground truth label and instead embed the annotations into a multidimensional space. This embedding is derived from the empirical distribution of annotations within a Bayesian setup, modelled using a Dirichlet-Multinomial framework. We estimate the model parameters and posteriors using a stochastic Expectation Maximizsation algorithm with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) steps. The methods developed in this article readily extend to various situations in which multiple annotators independently label instances. To showcase the generality of the proposed approach, we apply our approach to three benchmark datasets for image classification and natural language inference (NLI), in which multiple annotations per instance are available. Besides the embeddings, we can investigate the resulting correlation matrices, which reflect the semantic similarities of the original classes for all three exemplary datasets.

Statistical Modelling
GP Forschungsgruppe (DE), Munich Center for Machine Learning, Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.