How Commercial Banks Manage Risks Through Liquidity Governance

Commercial banks face inherent liquidity risks due to their business model of transforming short-term liabilities into long-term illiquid assets. This makes effective liquidity management a survival imperative during stress periods. Over the past two decades, particularly in the aftermath of the 2007–2009 global financial crisis, regulatory reforms such as Basel III have compelled banks to adopt more dynamic and integrated liquidity governance frameworks. These frameworks balance the need to maintain adequate high-quality liquid assets against the opportunity costs of holding low-yield assets. This literature review synthesizes empirical and conceptual work on liquidity risk management in commercial banks, emphasizing three core pillars: (1) dynamic measurement approaches, (2) asset–liability management techniques integrated with corporate governance, and (3) regulatory oversight aligned with macroeconomic conditions. It further contributes to theory by proposing a three-dimensional liquidity governance framework that bridges fragmented discussions in existing research and explains how institutions navigate trade-offs between liquidity, profitability, and institutional constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Insights
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70693/jei.v2i2.1486
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Commercial Banks Manage Risks Through Liquidity Governance

Zheng Huang
Journal of Economic Insights
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

How Commercial Banks Manage Risks Through Liquidity Governance

Zheng Huang
article en

Abstract

Commercial banks face inherent liquidity risks due to their business model of transforming short-term liabilities into long-term illiquid assets. This makes effective liquidity management a survival imperative during stress periods. Over the past two decades, particularly in the aftermath of the 2007–2009 global financial crisis, regulatory reforms such as Basel III have compelled banks to adopt more dynamic and integrated liquidity governance frameworks. These frameworks balance the need to maintain adequate high-quality liquid assets against the opportunity costs of holding low-yield assets. This literature review synthesizes empirical and conceptual work on liquidity risk management in commercial banks, emphasizing three core pillars: (1) dynamic measurement approaches, (2) asset–liability management techniques integrated with corporate governance, and (3) regulatory oversight aligned with macroeconomic conditions. It further contributes to theory by proposing a three-dimensional liquidity governance framework that bridges fragmented discussions in existing research and explains how institutions navigate trade-offs between liquidity, profitability, and institutional constraints.

Journal of Economic InsightsVol. 2(2)
Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.