Creating access or limiting authenticity? An examination of the potential and pitfalls of school-based Youth-Participatory Action Research

Youth-Participatory Action Research (YPAR) challenges traditional research hierarchies between young people and adults by situating youth as co-researchers rather than the objects of research. Like all forms of community-engaged research, Youth-Participatory Action Research involves collaborations between scholars and community members, and requires relationship-building to facilitate these partnerships. Power dynamics can be of particular importance in Youth-Participatory Action Research, given the prevalence of adultism in society. Conducting Youth-Participatory Action Research within the context of schools offers a mechanism to increase access for youth to participate, but can also pose challenges to Youth-Participatory Action Research’s liberatory aims and youth’s authentic engagement, given the often-hierarchical nature of schools. To expand research on the affordances and challenges of school-based Youth-Participatory Action Research, we conducted a qualitative self-study, examining two rounds of Youth-Participatory Action Research that occurred within the same Title 1 middle school, one of which took place virtually, via Zoom, and one that occurred in-person, on campus. Drawing upon fieldnotes and reflective memos, we identified key differences in processes and practices that impacted students’ experiences, which focused on project structure, roles and responsibilities of team members, and meeting durations and frequency. We found that increasing accessibility for youth involvement was not ‘one-size-fits-all’, but instead nuanced, based on both the setting and the students. Overall, this study revealed the complexity of conducting Youth-Participatory Action Research in school settings and the contextual factors that may influence student engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Research in Education
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785251392558
Primary Topic
Youth Development and Social Support
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating access or limiting authenticity? An examination of the potential and pitfalls of school-based Youth-Participatory Action Research

Jennifer Renick, Genaro López
Theory and Research in Education
Youth Development and Social Support
article

Creating access or limiting authenticity? An examination of the potential and pitfalls of school-based Youth-Participatory Action Research

Jennifer Renick, Genaro López
article en

Abstract

Youth-Participatory Action Research (YPAR) challenges traditional research hierarchies between young people and adults by situating youth as co-researchers rather than the objects of research. Like all forms of community-engaged research, Youth-Participatory Action Research involves collaborations between scholars and community members, and requires relationship-building to facilitate these partnerships. Power dynamics can be of particular importance in Youth-Participatory Action Research, given the prevalence of adultism in society. Conducting Youth-Participatory Action Research within the context of schools offers a mechanism to increase access for youth to participate, but can also pose challenges to Youth-Participatory Action Research’s liberatory aims and youth’s authentic engagement, given the often-hierarchical nature of schools. To expand research on the affordances and challenges of school-based Youth-Participatory Action Research, we conducted a qualitative self-study, examining two rounds of Youth-Participatory Action Research that occurred within the same Title 1 middle school, one of which took place virtually, via Zoom, and one that occurred in-person, on campus. Drawing upon fieldnotes and reflective memos, we identified key differences in processes and practices that impacted students’ experiences, which focused on project structure, roles and responsibilities of team members, and meeting durations and frequency. We found that increasing accessibility for youth involvement was not ‘one-size-fits-all’, but instead nuanced, based on both the setting and the students. Overall, this study revealed the complexity of conducting Youth-Participatory Action Research in school settings and the contextual factors that may influence student engagement.

Theory and Research in EducationVol. 23(3)
University of California, Irvine (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Youth Development and Social Support
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Creating access or limiting authenticity? An examination of the potential and pitfalls of school-based Youth-Participatory Action Research — Jennifer Renick, Genaro López · Theory and Research in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS