Low-density lipoprotein quantity versus quality: Discordance between equation-based low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimations and oxidized low-density lipoprotein as a determinant of residual cardiovascular risk in coronary artery disease

Background: Premature coronary artery disease (CAD), defined as onset at or before 45 years of age, has a disproportionately higher prevalence among South Asians compared to Western populations, with Indian individuals particularly affected. Traditional lipid metrics primarily quantify low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) but often fail to reflect qualitative changes, such as LDL oxidation, which may contribute to residual cardiovascular risk. Objective: This study aimed to assess the concordance among three LDL-C estimation methods (Friedewald, Martin–Hopkins, and NIH Equation-2) and their relationship with oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) levels in young Indian adults with premature CAD. Methods: This case–control study enrolled 150 participants, including 100 patients with CAD and 50 age-matched controls. Standard lipid parameters were measured, and LDL-C levels were calculated using Friedewald, Martin–Hopkins, and NIH Equation 2 methods while ox-LDL levels were quantified using sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Intergroup differences were evaluated using Mann–Whitney U -test. Associations among LDL-C estimates, conventional lipid fractions, and ox-LDL were examined using Spearman’s rho correlation analysis. Results: LDL-C estimation by all three methods demonstrated strong concordance. However, ox-LDL showed no significant correlation with any of the LDL-C estimation methods. This indicates that ox-LDL “quality” reflects a distinct atherogenic dimension independent of LDL-C “quantity.” Conclusions: Although LDL-C equations provide reliable estimates of LDL cholesterol levels, they do not capture oxidative modifications that contribute to residual cardiovascular risk. Integrating ox-LDL assessment into routine screening may strengthen early detection and enable targeted prevention, addressing the escalating public health burden of premature CAD among young Indians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heart India
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/heartindia.heartindia_77_25
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-density lipoprotein quantity versus quality: Discordance between equation-based low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimations and oxidized low-density lipoprotein as a determinant of residual cardiovascular risk in coronary artery disease

Rajesh Nandal, Jyoti Aggarwal, Sreenivas Reddy, Gobardhan Kathariya
1 citations
Heart India
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
2.01
article

Low-density lipoprotein quantity versus quality: Discordance between equation-based low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimations and oxidized low-density lipoprotein as a determinant of residual cardiovascular risk in coronary artery disease

Rajesh Nandal, Jyoti Aggarwal, Sreenivas Reddy, Gobardhan Kathariya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Premature coronary artery disease (CAD), defined as onset at or before 45 years of age, has a disproportionately higher prevalence among South Asians compared to Western populations, with Indian individuals particularly affected. Traditional lipid metrics primarily quantify low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) but often fail to reflect qualitative changes, such as LDL oxidation, which may contribute to residual cardiovascular risk. Objective: This study aimed to assess the concordance among three LDL-C estimation methods (Friedewald, Martin–Hopkins, and NIH Equation-2) and their relationship with oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) levels in young Indian adults with premature CAD. Methods: This case–control study enrolled 150 participants, including 100 patients with CAD and 50 age-matched controls. Standard lipid parameters were measured, and LDL-C levels were calculated using Friedewald, Martin–Hopkins, and NIH Equation 2 methods while ox-LDL levels were quantified using sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Intergroup differences were evaluated using Mann–Whitney U -test. Associations among LDL-C estimates, conventional lipid fractions, and ox-LDL were examined using Spearman’s rho correlation analysis. Results: LDL-C estimation by all three methods demonstrated strong concordance. However, ox-LDL showed no significant correlation with any of the LDL-C estimation methods. This indicates that ox-LDL “quality” reflects a distinct atherogenic dimension independent of LDL-C “quantity.” Conclusions: Although LDL-C equations provide reliable estimates of LDL cholesterol levels, they do not capture oxidative modifications that contribute to residual cardiovascular risk. Integrating ox-LDL assessment into routine screening may strengthen early detection and enable targeted prevention, addressing the escalating public health burden of premature CAD among young Indians.

Heart IndiaVol. 14(1)
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana (IN), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.