Retrospective study: the value of GDF-15 and conventional markers in combination for clinical diagnosis of lung cancer

Lung cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and effective biomarkers for its screening and monitoring are still lacking. This study aims to assess the diagnostic value of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) in lung cancer and its subtypes, compared to conventional biomarkers, to evaluate its potential as a predictive biomarker for lung cancer screening and monitoring. GDF15 levels were measured and analyzed in different subtypes of lung cancer and non-tumor controls. The correlation between GDF15 and the expression of eight conventional biomarkers was assessed by analyzing serum GDF15 levels in the markers<sup>normal</sup> groups and the markers<sup>high</sup> groups. The superiority of GDF15 in screening and monitoring of lung cancer was confirmed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of GDF15, alongside conventional biomarkers. Serum GDF15 levels were significantly higher in all subtypes of lung cancer compared with non-tumor controls, showing significant correlations with the levels of conventional biomarkers. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that GDF15 has superior sensitivity and specificity over conventional biomarkers, highlighting its potential as a promising diagnostic biomarker for lung cancer. GDF15 shows strong potential as a diagnostic tool for lung cancer, outperforming conventional markers. It presents a promising new biomarker for lung cancer monitoring and diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20281
Citations
1
Primary Topic
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrospective study: the value of GDF-15 and conventional markers in combination for clinical diagnosis of lung cancer

Cuiping Mao, Qinghai Lin, Xiaohe Hao, Yongkang Wu et al.
1 citations
PeerJ
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
1.67
article

Retrospective study: the value of GDF-15 and conventional markers in combination for clinical diagnosis of lung cancer

Cuiping Mao, Qinghai Lin, Xiaohe Hao, Yongkang Wu, Limin Niu, J. Ni, Heng Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Lung cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and effective biomarkers for its screening and monitoring are still lacking. This study aims to assess the diagnostic value of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) in lung cancer and its subtypes, compared to conventional biomarkers, to evaluate its potential as a predictive biomarker for lung cancer screening and monitoring. GDF15 levels were measured and analyzed in different subtypes of lung cancer and non-tumor controls. The correlation between GDF15 and the expression of eight conventional biomarkers was assessed by analyzing serum GDF15 levels in the markers<sup>normal</sup> groups and the markers<sup>high</sup> groups. The superiority of GDF15 in screening and monitoring of lung cancer was confirmed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of GDF15, alongside conventional biomarkers. Serum GDF15 levels were significantly higher in all subtypes of lung cancer compared with non-tumor controls, showing significant correlations with the levels of conventional biomarkers. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that GDF15 has superior sensitivity and specificity over conventional biomarkers, highlighting its potential as a promising diagnostic biomarker for lung cancer. GDF15 shows strong potential as a diagnostic tool for lung cancer, outperforming conventional markers. It presents a promising new biomarker for lung cancer monitoring and diagnosis.

PeerJVol. 13
Shandong University (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.