Précis of <i>Radical Skepticism and Epistemic Intuition</i>
Abstract In this précis of Radical Skepticism and Epistemic Intuition (Oxford 2021), I highlight the book’s main lines of argument and provide an overview of each of the book’s three parts. I explain how: part I identifies the best kind of argument for radical skepticism and objects to one of the two main ways of responding to it; part II presents my version of the other main way of responding to that skeptical argument (a version that relies heavily on epistemic intuition); and part III defends epistemic intuition (and, thereby, my response to radical skepticism) from several important objections.
Authors
- Michael Bergmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1905-8638)
Institutions
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Canadian Journal of Philosophy
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2025.10028
- Primary Topic
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00