Maurogemmiite, Ti <sub>10</sub> Fe <sub>3</sub> O <sub>3</sub> and paulrobinsonite, Ti <sub>8</sub> Fe <sub>4</sub> O <sub>2</sub> : new minerals in a coesite-bearing fragment from the Luobusa ophiolite, Tibet, China

Abstract Maurogemmiite, Ti 10 Fe 3 O 3 , and paulrobinsonite, Ti 8 Fe 4 O 2 , are two new mineral species in a fragment 0.45 mm × 0.8 mm in size extracted from chromitite orebody #31 in the Luobusa ophiolite near Luobusa Village, Tibet, China (29°13.86’N, 92°11.41’E). The fragment comprises (1) an alloy core consisting of a wangxibinite + ‘osbornite’ intergrowth, Ti and the new minerals; (2) an inner rim of Ti and (3) an outer rim of coesite, kyanite and amorphous Ti-aluminosilicate. Maurogemmiite forms irregular grains up to 30 μm across enclosed in paulrobinsonite, which isolated it from the wangxibinite (TiFe) + ‘osbornite’ intergrowth. Two standardless EDS analyses and O taken from the structurally refined model gave O 6.40, Al 0.26, Si 1.96, Ti 65.73, Fe 24.79, Ni 0.85, sum 100 wt.%. The empirical formula normalised to Ti = 10 is Al 0.07 Si 0.51 Ti 10 Fe 3.23 Ni 0.11 O 2.91 . Two standardless EDS analyses of paulrobinsonite gave O 3.73, Al 0.28, Si 1.82, Ti 56.50, Fe 35.65, Ni 2.03, sum 100 wt.%. The empirical formula normalised to Ti = 8 is Al 0.07 Si 0.44 Ti 8 Fe 4.33 Ni 0.23 O 1.58 . Three-dimensional electron diffraction (3DED) data on maurogemmiite delivered a primitive hexagonal cell, space group P 6 3 / mmc (#194) with a = 8.065(1) Å, c = 8.015(3) Å, V = 451.6(2) Å 3 and Z = 2. The structure is a compact framework with Ti1, Ti3 and Fe1 in coordination 12 and Ti2 in coordination 13. Both Ti2 and Ti3 show a wide range of interatomic distances, which result in interstitial positions occupied predominantly by O and partially by non-stoichiometric Fe. The 3DED data on paulrobinsonite delivered an F-centred cubic cell, space group Fd $\bar 3$ m (#227) with a = 11.388(4) Å, V = 1477.0(8) Å 3 and Z = 8. The structure is also a compact framework with Ti1 and Fe1 in coordination 12 and Ti2 in coordination 14, whereas the remaining Fe and all O atoms occupy interstitial positions in nearly regular octahedral coordination with Ti2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mineralogical Magazine
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2025.10169
Primary Topic
Crystal Structures and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maurogemmiite, Ti 10 Fe 3 O 3 and paulrobinsonite, Ti 8 Fe 4 O 2 : new minerals in a coesite-bearing fragment from the Luobusa ophiolite, Tibet, China

Enrico Mugnaioli, Jingsui Yang, P. Franke, Edward S. Grew et al.
Mineralogical Magazine
Crystal Structures and Properties
article

Maurogemmiite, Ti 10 Fe 3 O 3 and paulrobinsonite, Ti 8 Fe 4 O 2 : new minerals in a coesite-bearing fragment from the Luobusa ophiolite, Tibet, China

Enrico Mugnaioli, Jingsui Yang, P. Franke, Edward S. Grew, Fahui Xiong, Xiangzhen Xu, Richard Wirth
article en

Abstract

Abstract Maurogemmiite, Ti 10 Fe 3 O 3 , and paulrobinsonite, Ti 8 Fe 4 O 2 , are two new mineral species in a fragment 0.45 mm × 0.8 mm in size extracted from chromitite orebody #31 in the Luobusa ophiolite near Luobusa Village, Tibet, China (29°13.86’N, 92°11.41’E). The fragment comprises (1) an alloy core consisting of a wangxibinite + ‘osbornite’ intergrowth, Ti and the new minerals; (2) an inner rim of Ti and (3) an outer rim of coesite, kyanite and amorphous Ti-aluminosilicate. Maurogemmiite forms irregular grains up to 30 μm across enclosed in paulrobinsonite, which isolated it from the wangxibinite (TiFe) + ‘osbornite’ intergrowth. Two standardless EDS analyses and O taken from the structurally refined model gave O 6.40, Al 0.26, Si 1.96, Ti 65.73, Fe 24.79, Ni 0.85, sum 100 wt.%. The empirical formula normalised to Ti = 10 is Al 0.07 Si 0.51 Ti 10 Fe 3.23 Ni 0.11 O 2.91 . Two standardless EDS analyses of paulrobinsonite gave O 3.73, Al 0.28, Si 1.82, Ti 56.50, Fe 35.65, Ni 2.03, sum 100 wt.%. The empirical formula normalised to Ti = 8 is Al 0.07 Si 0.44 Ti 8 Fe 4.33 Ni 0.23 O 1.58 . Three-dimensional electron diffraction (3DED) data on maurogemmiite delivered a primitive hexagonal cell, space group P 6 3 / mmc (#194) with a = 8.065(1) Å, c = 8.015(3) Å, V = 451.6(2) Å 3 and Z = 2. The structure is a compact framework with Ti1, Ti3 and Fe1 in coordination 12 and Ti2 in coordination 13. Both Ti2 and Ti3 show a wide range of interatomic distances, which result in interstitial positions occupied predominantly by O and partially by non-stoichiometric Fe. The 3DED data on paulrobinsonite delivered an F-centred cubic cell, space group Fd $\bar 3$ m (#227) with a = 11.388(4) Å, V = 1477.0(8) Å 3 and Z = 8. The structure is also a compact framework with Ti1 and Fe1 in coordination 12 and Ti2 in coordination 14, whereas the remaining Fe and all O atoms occupy interstitial positions in nearly regular octahedral coordination with Ti2.

Mineralogical MagazineVol. 89(6)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), University of Pisa (IT), Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CN), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geology (CZ), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), University of Maine (US), Nanjing University (CN)
University of Cambridge, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Università di Pisa, China Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Crystal Structures and Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.