Three fuel models for predicting urban fire spread – a stopgap for emergency management in the US

Background Prevailing American wildland fire modelling systems fail to predict fire growth in urban areas due to the absence of burnable urban fuels. Aims This research aims to identify fuel models that optimise fire spread in urban areas relative to a hypothetical fire spread model derived from observations of recent urban fires. Methods A target Rate of Spread (RoS) is derived from observations of seven urban conflagrations to anchor the model to absolute RoS. Exhaustive parameter sweeps are used to identify combinations of fuel variables that result in optimal performance. Key results The target RoS is 0.81 km/h. Parameter sweeps converge on unique sets of fuel parameters including (1) BU0, an unconstrained custom fuel model; (2) BU1, a custom fuel model that operates within the constraints of current US modelling systems; and (3) Anderson Fuel Model 9, a best-performing standard fuel model. Conclusions & implications Although this approach stretches current modelling systems beyond their intended design, the resultant fuel models provide a necessary stopgap for emergency management until urban-specific fire spread models find their way into operational use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wf24132
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three fuel models for predicting urban fire spread – a stopgap for emergency management in the US

Bradley M. Pietruszka, Carl Seielstad, Christopher J. Moran
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Three fuel models for predicting urban fire spread – a stopgap for emergency management in the US

Bradley M. Pietruszka, Carl Seielstad, Christopher J. Moran
article en

Abstract

Background Prevailing American wildland fire modelling systems fail to predict fire growth in urban areas due to the absence of burnable urban fuels. Aims This research aims to identify fuel models that optimise fire spread in urban areas relative to a hypothetical fire spread model derived from observations of recent urban fires. Methods A target Rate of Spread (RoS) is derived from observations of seven urban conflagrations to anchor the model to absolute RoS. Exhaustive parameter sweeps are used to identify combinations of fuel variables that result in optimal performance. Key results The target RoS is 0.81 km/h. Parameter sweeps converge on unique sets of fuel parameters including (1) BU0, an unconstrained custom fuel model; (2) BU1, a custom fuel model that operates within the constraints of current US modelling systems; and (3) Anderson Fuel Model 9, a best-performing standard fuel model. Conclusions & implications Although this approach stretches current modelling systems beyond their intended design, the resultant fuel models provide a necessary stopgap for emergency management until urban-specific fire spread models find their way into operational use.

International Journal of Wildland FireVol. 34(11)
Rocky Mountain Research Station (US), University of Montana (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Three fuel models for predicting urban fire spread – a stopgap for emergency management in the US — Bradley M. Pietruszka, Carl Seielstad, et al. · International Journal of Wildland Fire (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS